Weed Out the Weak

Written by Armond White on . Posted in Arts & Film, Posts

Facebook Twitter Email

WILD GRASS

Directed by Alain Resnais

Runtime: 113 min.

THE KILLER INSIDE ME

Directed by Michael Winterbottom

Runtime: 109
min.

ALAIN RESNAIS WAS never a pop filmmaker. His “fun” always comes
with an intellectual prerequisite that bespeaks class while also
evaluating it. His experiments with narrative form are also a kind of
emotional rigor and it often expands into glorious empathy, as in his
latest film Wild Grass—although the title Les Herbes Folles suggests
“Crazy Grass,” which accounts for the personal eccentricity that
structures a relationship between Georges (Andre Sussolier), who finds a
woman’s wallet, and the wallet’s owner, Marguerite (Sabine Azema).

From the first
close-up of images of weeds in fields and then in cracks of pavement,
Resnais dissolves to people on the street. He surveys human behavior as
parallels of nature. Every image and transition conveys a thought (as
when Georges seeks out Marguerite’s apartment and assorted address
numbers appear in progressive sequence). These visual kinetics describe
Resnais’ elegant, gliding, tracking camera style. Since Mélo (1986),
he has favored theatrical/cinematic contrivance—non-realism—where only
actors/people, feelings and thoughts are foremost, distilling life to
“incidents,” as in the title of Christian Gailly’s source novel.

Wild Grass relays
each incident of Georges and Marguerite’s tentative flirtation through
such exquisite refinement—an amazing 360-degree slo-mo pan around
Marguerite somehow maintains her anomie—that it embarrasses just about
every other piece of filmmaking around. Ironically, in fraudulent
experimenter Michael Winterbottom’s ugly, ugly The Killer Inside Me, Bill
Pullman plays a lawyer who quotes novelist Jim Thompson’s pithy, “A
weed is just a plant out of place,” which turns out to echo Resnais’
central concept. Despite being well-heeled, Resnais’ characters suffer
social alienation: the pleasures of childhood and escape trouble their
adult consciousness. Both Georges and Marguerite yearn for aviation,
admiring airplanes for being able to lift them from gravity, and Resnais
ingeniously demonstrates how it inhabits their every thought, gesture,
hesitation and observation. (A droll touch: Marguerite’s wild red hair
and full-length uniform resemble Saint-Exupery’s Little Prince.)

This is greater than
the facile existentialism in Winterbottom’s vicious film-noir pastiche,
which leaks any surprise simply by casting mealy-mouthed, squeakyvoiced
Casey Affleck as psychopathic Texas cop Lou Ford. Winterbottom’s
emphasis on Ford’s sexual aberration—he keeps copies of Freud and
Havelock Ellis in his library— feels deceitful when no interest is shown
in the sexual history of other characters or his victims. Winterbottom
is in Mike Figgis mode, offering grossly violent filmnoir clichés, made
of punching-bag-face make-up, gratuitous sex and Dark Knight nihilism—a
crude contrast to sophisticated Resnais, where sexual desire is as airy
yet deep as peak Ernst Lubitsch.

As a contemporary of the French New Wave, Resnais
continues to innovate cinema. Not as a winking hipster like Winterbottom
but as an aesthetic philosopher. Wild Grass’ “plot” is more
psychological, not random, and reaches its own peak of sophistication
when Marguerite tracks Georges to a movie theater and in the red glow of
the Cinema’s neon sign reveal their secret fears and desires. That this
unforgettable moment is not at all realistic gives it extraordinary
power. Twenty-first-century audiences might liken its artifice to Eyes
Wide Shut, In the Mood for Love
and even Inglourious Basterds, but
Resnais now has greatness at his fingertips and reduces those films to
nitrate dust.