Theater: Hippie Hop
The producers of the Public Theaters loving revival of Hair in Central Park have put aside the reality that most of us recall not the original (and far less linear) 1968 Broadway production, but instead the lean, fun 1979 Milos Forman film adaptation. I left the Delacorte Theater last Saturday night with renewed respect for the Czech movie director who took the Broadway version and re-fashioned it into a tight, endearing movie musical mostly by cutting songs that stretched out the simple story into an epic rock-opera of emotional uplift. But by the end of a long night at the Delacorteone that included actors roaming the aisles for loose change, waving their hair in peoples faces and, at the end, inviting the audience on stage to boogieI had given in, like everyone else, to the intoxicating power of a natural high.
Theres really not much point denying the power of the dozen or so songs that make Hair a classic: This production offers near-perfect renditions of Aquarius, Where Do I Go? and Hair along with one song wrongly cut from the moviethe spectacular and haunting Frank Mills. Its fun to watch well-trained actors bring to life lyrics imbedded in your brain and to hear melodies that soar; its a musical score as good as any ever performed on a Broadway stage, with endlessly brilliant, hilarious lyrics. And the cast assembled to stage for this production has the looks and talent to keep even the most hardened cynic mesmerized. The first act takes off so fast and forges such a strong emotional connection (with an audience who has long ago memorized the melodies) that its nearly impossible to resist its pull.
And yet, to my surprise, boredom sets in quickly after intermission, when an epic hallucination sequencewisely trimmed in the moviestrings together several songs that put an end to the shows heart-stopping pleasures. Its no creative crisis: This production will move to Broadway and undoubtedly collect tons of awards. But would it have hurt the cause to cut judiciously from a show with more than two dozen songs and multiple reprises? With so many back-to-back pleasures in Hair, it seemed indulgent to restore every melody removed by Forman in his equally moving interpretation.
This is a minor quibble with Hair, a long-overdue and mostly inspired answer to the prayers of those who stand for hours every summer in the hopes of a wonderful bargain in a spectacular settingand frequently end up disappointed. I loved the performance of Jonathan Groff as Claude Hooper Bukowski; even though I preferred the characters hick-to-hippie transformation added to Hair by the movies screenwriter, Michael Weller, Groff managed to make sense of the original muddled conception of Claude as a hippie to begin with.
The point of a nostalgia trip like this is to restore sensations lost or forgotten over time, and even this flawed production succeeds on that levelespecially if youre the type to enjoy making googly eyes with actors when they come visit you at your seat. Im not, but this show succeeds at making a human connection in other ways, most of them musical. And the epic, thrilling rendition of Let The Sunshine In at the curtain call gives the audience time to revel privately in whatever pleasures they associate with those bygone daysand to enjoy the chance to sing along with the gifted, gorgeous cast under the spell of an August moon. Its enough to justify the indulgence of brilliant artists who should have known better than to reject some shrewd, delicate editing of their timeless masterpiece.
Hair, through Sept. 7, Delacorte Theater, 81 Central Park West (at 68th St.), 212-535-4284; 8, free.