<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NYPress.com - New York&#039;s essential guide to culture, arts, politics, news and more &#187; patrik-ian polk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nypress.com/tag/patrik-ian-polk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nypress.com</link>
	<description>New York&#039;s essential guide to culture, arts, politics, news and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 22:07:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Armond White&#8217;s Mid-Year Awards</title>
		<link>http://nypress.com/armond-whites-mid-year-awards/</link>
		<comments>http://nypress.com/armond-whites-mid-year-awards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 14:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Armond White</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts & Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[a thousand words]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abraham Lincoln: vampire hunter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[americano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[André Téchiné]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[andrew dussollier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[andrew sarris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Armond White]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brian robbins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carole bouquet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Damsels in Distress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dardennes brothers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dark horse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Wain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ghost rider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hollywood film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joseph khan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joyful noise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luc Besson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mark neveldine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mathieu Demy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael cuesta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moonrise Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nouvelle vague]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patrik-ian polk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roadie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sean anders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terence Davies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[that's my boy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the american cinemacinema authorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the deep blue sea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the flowers of war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the kid with a bike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the lady]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Graff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Solondz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unforgivable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wanderlust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wes Anderson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whit Stillman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yimou]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nypress.com/?p=50100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2012’s best so far and Sarris remembered This year, I want to do the Mid-Year Reckoning differently, as a tribute to film critic Andrew Sarris’ recent passing. It was Sarris, during my grad school years at Columbia, who wisely advised that the percentage of good movies has not changed from the old days; now that ]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<div id="attachment_50101" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://nypress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/year.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-50101" title="year" src="http://nypress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/year-300x221.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="221" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Carole Bouquet and André Dussollier in Unforgivable.</p></div>
<p><em>2012’s best so far and Sarris remembered</em></p>
<p>This year, I want to do the Mid-Year Reckoning differently, as a tribute to film critic Andrew Sarris’ recent passing. It was Sarris, during my grad school years at Columbia, who wisely advised that the percentage of good movies has not changed from the old days; now that the output is larger, the significance of sifting out the trash is more important than ever. Sarris’ indispensable work The American Cinema, first published in 1968, used the Nouvelle Vague’s notion of auteurism (cinema authorship) to categorize all Hollywood film history up to that point.</p>
<p>Sarris’ commentary on over 200 directors was an awesome feat, combining scholarship with sharp perception. His extraordinary assessments should still structure anyone’s thinking about movies, American or global.</p>
<p>Because The American Cinema emerged from cinema’s first half-century, it preserves aesthetics and values (pillars from Griffith to Sternberg) that have been lost in the recent years of criticism’s decline, in which media and box-office presence is given importance over the individual visions that Sarris knew were what made cinema an art form. He articulated that belief with idiosyncratic precision that to this day—when both Hollywood and the critical “community” have lost self-respect—is still awesome to read.</p>
<p>Each summer, my mid-year assessment has been a way to keep track of the movie year’s deluge, which, given the dozen or more films that open every week, is more than can be reviewed. Perhaps the reckoning might this time benefit from following Sarris’ model, as a reminder of the standards a film-lover has every right to uphold.</p>
<p>I take great exception to the TV pundit whose memorial to Sarris cited that he “loved movies.” Sarris’ work was greater than any fanboy obsession—everybody “loves” movies, but Sarris turned his interest into teaching, study and personal expression, the things that make criticism valuable, an art in its own right.</p>
<p>With continued respect for Sarris, one of the two critics who have meant the most to me, professionally and personally, I repeat The American Cinema’s first nine top-tobottom categories, citing the work of individual directors. It could help to understand how 2012’s best films so far might ultimately rank in film history or, as Sarris crucially demonstrated, in a personal pantheon rigorous enough to share with the world.</p>
<p><strong>Pantheon Directors</strong><br />
Unforgivable (André Téchiné)—a tumultuous view of private lives as society and society as family.<br />
The Deep Blue Sea (Terence Davies)—examines the linkage of desire and despair to find the value of personal resurrection.</p>
<p><strong>The Far Side of Paradise</strong><br />
Damsels in Distress (Whit Stillman)—the rare campus comedy genre visits private worlds that reflect the eccentricities we recognize deep down.<br />
Moonrise Kingdom (Wes Anderson)— compares the innocence of youth and maturity.<br />
Dark Horse (Todd Solondz)—tragedy found in the comedy of hopes squandered by misguided fashions. The Skinny (Patrik-Ian Polk)—clarifies the blur of sex and friendship that gay life faces straight-on.<br />
A Thousand Words (Brian Robbins)—a Hollywood satire so casually profound it scared off the industry and its fans.</p>
<p><strong>Expressive Esoterica</strong><br />
Americano (Mathieu Demy)—an Oedipal odyssey that finds cultural heritage in family legacy.<br />
Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance (Mark Neveldine and Brian Taylor)—addresses action movie tropes to satirize the deficiencies of contemporary genre excess.<br />
The Lady (Luc Besson)—eloquently acted political biopic, refined non-comic-book heroism.<br />
The Flowers of War (Zhang Yimou)—common tragedy and possibility, rapturously envisioned.</p>
<p><strong>Fringe Benefits</strong><br />
Detention (Joseph Kahn)—traces moral chaos throughout recent pop history. Chronicle (Jonathan Trank)—youth’s visionary search for meaning.<br />
Wanderlust (David Wain)—audacious mockery of Occupy sentimentality and its outdated hippie heritage.<br />
That’s My Boy (Sean Anders)—empathy, heredity and its discontents.</p>
<p>Joyful Noise (Todd Graff)—the anodyne effects of music and the movie musical.</p>
<p>Less Than Meets the Eye<br />
Roadie (Michael Cuesta)—great performance by Ron Eldard.<br />
The Kid with a Bike (Dardennes brothers)— modern neuroses given fairytale attention.<br />
Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter (Timur Bekmambetov)—trash made uncommonly spectacular.</p>
<p><strong>Lightly Likable:</strong> Being Flynn, Darling Companion, Man on a Ledge, Where Do We Go Now?</p>
<p><strong>Strained Seriousness:</strong> The Turin Horse, Safe, Neil Young Journeys, Magic Mike</p>
<p><strong>Make Way for the Clowns:</strong> Ted, The Dictator, Casa de mi Padre</p>
<p><strong>Oddities, One-Shots and Newcomers:</strong> Seeking a Friend for the End of the World, Beasts of the Southern Wild, Gerhard Richter Painting, Locked Out, John Carter</p>
<p>To read more from City Arts <a href="http://cityarts.info">click here. </a></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nypress.com/armond-whites-mid-year-awards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Armond White: How The Skinny Humanizes Gay Cinema</title>
		<link>http://nypress.com/armond-white-how-the-skinny-humanizes-gay-cinema/</link>
		<comments>http://nypress.com/armond-white-how-the-skinny-humanizes-gay-cinema/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 20:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Armond White</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts & Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Burrell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Armond White]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gus van sant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jussie Smollett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york pride week]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patrik-ian polk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shanika Warren-Markland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The skinny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[todd haynes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wes Anderson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nypress.com/?p=48823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The title of The Skinny refers to gossip–the low-down between friends–but read another way (in the credit sequence’s colorful graphics) it also refers to sexual opportunities in New York City. Writer-director Patrik-Ian Polk is interested in the erotic possibilities found by five young black gays, recent Brown University graduates, who reunite during New York’s Pride ]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p><a href="http://nypress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/The-Skinny-film-2.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-48824" title="The-Skinny-film-2" src="http://nypress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/The-Skinny-film-2-300x200.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="200" /></a>The title of <em>The Skinny</em> refers to gossip–the low-down between friends–but read another way (in the credit sequence’s colorful graphics) it also refers to sexual opportunities in New York City. Writer-director Patrik-Ian Polk is interested in the erotic possibilities found by five young black gays, recent Brown University graduates, who reunite during New York’s Pride Week celebrations. Gorgeous, young, educated black gays like these don’t appear in movies by Gus Van Sant, Todd Haynes nor in mainstream Hollywood films. They hail from a society that only Polk puts on screen–a world recognizably his own vision like Wes Anderson’s and equally as affecting.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p>By placing them in New York, Polk gives his characters a cultural coming-out (in the debutante sense) which also means advancing upon the bourgeois mainstream already so well represented by media-empowered white gays that these characters seem new–in fact, almost alien to the <em>New York Times</em> whose dismissive review linked Polk‘s characters to “an invisible demographic.” Nothing could be more clueless–or so tragically revealing of mainstream media’s self-important blindness.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p>Fact is, as Polk casts and photographs his characters, they are visualized quite handsomely. Joey‘s joking lament “Who knew an Ivy League degree in semiotics would be so useful!” turns out to perfectly define the film’s success. These good-looking black folk are living signs–of black, gay social progress and arrival–although the mainstream media might label them “minorities”.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p>Magnus (Jussie Smollett, a Prince-look-alike but with dimples) breaks up with his thug-hot boyfriend Ryan (Dustin Ross), while virginal Sebastian (Blake Young-Fountain) hankers after his studly best friend Kyle (Anthony Burrell). Beautiful British dyke Langston (Shanika Warren-Markland) and the elegantly masculine Southern queen Joey (Jeffrey Bowyer-Chapman) watch from the sides, nervous about making their own hook-ups. This group resembles the ensemble of Polk’s trailblazing LOGO-TV series <em>Noah’s Arc</em>, but he’s refined the stereotypes into more subtly-performed archetypes. These actors represent the range of urban black males less realistically than were the women in <em>Pariah</em> but more idealistically, like the co-eds in Whit Stillman’s <em>Damsels in Distress</em>. Their rom-com search for love is also a quest for self-acceptance (infatuated Magnus opens the film kissing and grinning with emotional satisfaction) despite New York pressures of class, disease and insecurity that keep them from being carefree.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p>Yet, Polk’s characters seem charmingly carefree the same way as Anderson’s. Polk finds comedy and drama in Magnus &amp; friends’ state of untested innocence. He has discovered a knack for personal identification and audience assent that sets him apart from more celebrated black or gay cineastes. This makes Polk not merely a queer filmmaker but part of the current brotherhood of genuine American Eccentrics.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p>Would Gus Van Sant or Todd Haynes have the affectionate wit to lovingly stage a discussion about sexual hygiene? The <em>Times</em>’ nonplussed reviewer could only belittle the moment as a PSA rather than a disclosure of brotherly intimacy (made so by Bowyer-Chapman’s winning sense of concern and confession). Aspects of <em>The Skinny</em> indeed have a gossipy style of instruction–it’s part of unfortunate p.c. habits Polk picked up from television. His style could be subtler (the images could use some concentration) still it’s imminently watchable. And populist in ways most gay-identified filmmakers never achieve having worked themselves into the specialized ghetto reserved for detached artistes like Van Sant and Haynes. Only John Cameron Mitchell and Ira Sachs are trying to work themselves out of that rut.</p>
<p>To read the full review at City Arts <a href="http://cityarts.info/2012/06/16/the-queer-eccentric/">click here. </a></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nypress.com/armond-white-how-the-skinny-humanizes-gay-cinema/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
