Congressional District 12, Carolyn Maloney vs. Chris Wight

U.S. Rep. Carolyn Maloney

In this race for Congress, our endorsement goes to Democratic incumbent and prolific legislator U.S. Rep. Carolyn Maloney. Maloney has consistently delivered federal funding and services to her district, championing the Second Avenue Subway and other capital projects, working hard on the 9/11 Zadroga bill to grant healthcare to those affected by the terrorist attacks, and pushing against the Republican onslaught on women’s rights at the national level. While her Republican opponent Christ Wight has said that he is pro-choice, he doesn’t have a platform for promoting continued access to abortion and reproductive healthcare. Wight also toes the Republican line on cutting taxes and said that he would focus more on reducing corporate taxes than bringing federal dollars into the state and the district, which we believe would hurt, not help, the Upper East Side.

Senate District 28, Liz Krueger vs. David Garland

Sen. Liz Krueger

David Garland, a Republican and Independence Party candidate, presented a strong campaign with well-developed ideas for the Upper East Side. Garland, who speaks six languages and works at a management consultant for Fortune 500 companies, is a fiscal conservative, advocating for better use of tax incentives at the state level as well as reducing taxes for small businesses and corporations to keep them in New York. He also is a social libertarian, supporting gay marriage and reproductive and abortion rights. He is running, however, against a very strong opponent in State Senator Liz Krueger, and our endorsement goes to her in this race. Krueger has been a consistent champion of women’s rights as well as a powerful force in the Senate, as she serves as the ranking Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee and could become the chair if her party takes the majority. She consistently provides excellent constituent services while diving into the weeds of budgets and complicated legislative issues, like the Reproductive Health Act that would move the state’s reproductive health laws from the penal to the civil code. While we support Sen. Krueger in this race, we hope to see David Garland continue in politics and would have considered endorsing him against a weaker Democratic candidate.

Senate District 31, Adriano Espaillat vs. Martin Chicon

We are declining to endorse either candidate in this race. While Republican Martin Chicon argued that he would be able to better serve the district as part of the (currently) majority party in the Senate and said that he would bring development and transit improvements to the district, we were not completely convinced that he would be the best representative for the Upper West Side’s heavily Democratic and liberal constituency. We are unable to endorse his opponent, incumbent Sen. Adriano Espaillat, however, since he did not make himself available for an endorsement interview.

Assembly District 76, Micah Kellner vs. Mike Zumbluskas

Assembly Member Micah Kellner

Democratic incumbent Micah Kellner presented a compelling case for promoting his reelection, specifically with an eye toward his advocacy on behalf of creating a new middle school in the district and his work against the East 91st Street Marine Transfer Station. He also is supportive of raising the minimum wage as well as creating an angel investor tax credit, similar to what other states have implemented successfully, to keep tech innovators in New York. He is a strong opponent of hydrofracking in the state and said that he will continue to push to prevent or restrict it. His opponent, Mike Zumbluskas, is an Independent candidate running on the Republican line, and while he presented some ideas similar to Kellner, his emphasis on reducing taxes and challenging the Democratic majority in the Assembly were not strong enough reasons for voters to choose him. Despite the widely circulated rumor that he will be running for city council in 2013 (which he would neither confirm nor deny), we endorse Kellner in this race.

Assembly District 73, Dan Quart vs. David Casavis 

Assembly Member Dan Quart

In this race, we endorse the freshman incumbent Assemblyman Dan Quart. After winning the seat just over a year ago in a special election, Quart is running for a full term with a focus on improving the state and city’s energy policies and improving access to quality education on the Upper East Side. While we wish that Quart had presented a slightly stronger case for voters to return him to Albany, we also recognize that he’s only had a year in the job and we look forward to seeing what he can do if he wins reelection and had a full term to develop some of his positions and advance his ideas, especially in promoting green energy. His Republican opponent, David Casavis, who ran for Manhattan Borough President against Scott Stringer in 2009, presented little in the way of specific plans to help his district and almost no indication of the type of legislation he would pass, aside from opposing Democrats.

Assembly District 65, Sheldon Silver vs. Wave Chan 

Assembly Speaker Sheldon SIlver

While we wish that there were a stronger challenger running against all-powerful Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver, our endorsement in this race still goes to him. Especially in light of his botched handling of the Vito Lopez sexual harassment scandal, many argue that Silver’s iron-clad hold over the Assembly could use a shake-up, but the Tea Party Republican candidate Wave Chan isn’t the person to do that. Silver remains popular in his district and does advocate for his constituents’ needs, while Chan could only present vague ideas about severely cutting corporate taxes and encouraging new housing development without clear plans as to how he would specifically help the Lower East Side. He also would be a poor fit for a district with an active LGBT population, as he does not support gay marriage, only civil unions.

Manhattan Borough President

Incumbent: Scott Stringer, Democrat

Educational background: I graduated from New York City public schools, including John F. Kennedy High School and John Jay College of Criminal Justice.

Qualifications for office: As a lifelong Manhattanite, I am devoted to public service. I served for 13 years in the State Assembly, where I authored legislation to protect victims of domestic violence, led the successful fight to end “empty-seat voting” in Albany and voted against every attempt to weaken rent regulations. As Borough President, I have revitalized Manhattan’s community boards, built coalitions among diverse stakeholders, used the land-use process to tackle issues ranging from affordable housing to school overcrowding, and worked to make Manhattan healthier, greener, safer and more affordable.

Three goals I’d most want to accomplish during my next term: 1) Manhattan’s public schools will top my agenda. Continued progress on public education is essential for the future of our children and our economic vitality. Although English and mathematics test scores have improved, many challenges remain. My work on school overcrowding created new schools and started reforming the city’s planning process for school construction to prepare for the likely addition of a million residents in the next two decades. 2) I will bolster Manhattan’s economic security by working to create jobs, support small business and diversify our economy beyond Wall Street. 3) I will strive to make New York the greenest and healthiest city in the United States by fighting to reduce diabetes and asthma and expanding my “Go Green” programs that add farmers markets, plant street trees and give people healthier food choices.

Why my challenger is the wrong person for this job: I believe the office of borough president plays an indispensable role in giving neighborhoods a voice in development and solving Manhattan’s problems. My challenger, who seems like a very nice fellow, does not.

Challenger: David Casavis, Republican

Educational background: B.A., SUNY Buffalo, history/education (teacher’s certificate); M.B.A., PACE University; M.S. in real estate valuation and analysis, New York University.

Qualifications for office: There is almost nothing left to the office of borough president except for urban land issues. I have worked on, and extensively written about, these issues for more than 20 years. These included an impact study on New York City if the city won the 2008 Olympic bid, and a projection of where the new central business district of Berlin would form after the fall of the Berlin Wall, when East and West Berlin came together as one city. I have been involved with the ULURP land-use review procedure and assembled the Society of Industrial Office Realtors’ annual report. I will continue to work on such land-use issues long after my opponent moves on to his next appointive position. I hope to utilize my vast expanse of technical expertise in the field to represent Manhattan.

Three goals I’d most want to accomplish during my first term: There is only one issue in any borough president’s race: whether to keep a vestigial organ or to remove it. Like the human appendix, it is benign until it becomes infected—and then it must be removed. Twenty years after the U.S. Supreme Court found that the Board of Estimate proffered unconstitutional representation to different boroughs, the president of the Board of Estimate is still on the ballot. I promise that, when elected, I will make it my sole impetus to eradicate the office of the borough president, beginning with my own seat in Manhattan.

The incumbent’s biggest failing: I am running against an office, not an individual. Yet I am moved by the many rank-and-file Democrats who labor diligently for their party and their beliefs only to be scorned by one of the elected officials they labored so hard for.

City Comptroller

John Liu, Democrat

Educational background: I am a proud product of New York City public schools, beginning with kindergarten at P.S. 20 and going all the way through to the Bronx High School of Science. I went on to earn a degree in mathematical physics at SUNY-Binghamton.

Qualifications for office: I am a certified actuary, and immediately prior to my historic election in 2001, I managed a team of actuaries at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, working on the largest pension plans in the country. This professional experience, combined with my extensive understanding of city government gained through my terms in the City Council, qualify me well to serve as the next city comptroller.

Three goals I’d most want to accomplish during my first term: 1) Ensure federal stimulus funds are actually used for capital infrastructure projects (i.e. roads, bridges, mass transit) and for creating jobs in New York City. 2) Ensure equal opportunities for women- and minority-owned businesses, especially with regard to the procurement process. 3) Accountability and transparency in city agencies, achieved by fully utilizing the power of audit (both financial and operational) upon city agencies, particularly the Department of Education, the Industrial Development Agency and the Economic Development Corporation. Also examine past and future city development deals that feature(d) specific promises of affordable housing and job creation.

Why I am a better choice than my opponent: As my fellow comptroller candidates, I offer professional financial expertise. However, unlike the other candidates who would likely face a much steeper learning curve, I bring the deep understanding of how city government and agencies work in order for me to hit the ground running on January 1, 2010.

Joe Mendola, Republican

Educational background: Archbishop Molloy High School, Queens, N.Y., class of 1980, Fordham College, Bronx, N.Y., class of 1984 (final rank 3/605), Columbia University School of law, class of 1987.

Qualifications for office: Legal, compliance and risk abatement and audit specialist with expertise in the rules governing investments, the formulation of investment strategies and the tools necessary to conduct effective audits—two skills essential to any successful New York City comptroller.

Three goals I’d most want to accomplish during my first term: 1) Minimize taxpayer contributions to New York City pension fund payments by effectively investing the New York City pension funds in appropriate and sound investments. 2) Complete the first thorough and comprehensive fiscal audit of the New York City Department of Education. 3) Eliminate $300 million in fees paid by the city to so-called “outside experts” hired to “assist” the comptroller in managing New York City pension funds.

Why I am a better choice than my opponent: I am not a career politician, I have no interest in running for mayor and will not use the office as a stepping-stone to higher citywide office. I am not beholden to special interest groups, such as the Working Families Party and ACORN and, as such, I will make decisions using my private-sector expertise with a goal toward safeguarding New York City taxpayer funds.

Public Advocate

Bill de Blasio, Democrat

Educational background: bachelor’s degree from New York University; master’s in international and public affairs from Columbia University.

Qualifications for office: As a Council member, I have been a dedicated advocate for New Yorkers, keeping government accountable and defending our right to full participation in the democratic process. Whether advocating for parents and children as a school board member, exercising tough oversight over the city’s child welfare and homeless services as chair of the Council’s General Welfare Committee, or leading the effort to oppose the mayor’s term limits law, I’ve never shied away from a tough fight or making tough choices.
Throughout my career in public life, I’ve gotten results for New Yorkers. I’ve found that this takes persistence, creative thinking and the ability to assemble broad coalitions of support—qualities New Yorkers should demand of their public advocate.

Three goals I’d most want to accomplish during my first term: 1) Education: increasing parent engagement in public schools. 2) Reforming the Civilian Complaint Review Board: improving civilian oversight and restoring public confidence. 3) Affordable housing: promoting the creation of affordable housing through the land-use process and organizing communities around development projects.

Why I am a better choice than my opponent: My priorities as public advocate will reflect my values: a belief in efficient and transparent government, dedication to helping New Yorkers and the willingness to make hard choices. The job of the public advocate is, most fundamentally, that of a watchdog—ensuring that all New Yorkers receive the city services they deserve and have a voice in shaping the policies of their government. Through exercising the specific powers of the public advocate’s office and my position as an independent, citywide leader, I will advance key issues and advocate for New Yorkers each day.

Alex Zablocki, Republican

Educational background: I am a proud product of the New York City public school system and I earned a bachelor’s in finance and investments from the Zicklin School of Business at Baruch College in Manhattan.

Qualifications for office: For more than six years I have worked in city and state government, serving as director of land use and chief of staff for City Council district 51 from 2003-2006, and as district director for State Senate district 24 since 2007. As director of land use, I successfully worked with civic associations and numerous city agencies on eight rezoning applications to fight overdevelopment. In both the Senate and Council, I have worked with residents to fight for better city services, more funding for community-based programs and schools, housing, traffic solutions and more mass transit options. Since 2001, I have owned and operated a small business, and in 2007, I obtained a financial services license (Series 7).

Three goals I’d most want to accomplish during my first term: 1) Decentralize the office and work closely with all community boards to bring local issues to City Hall, giving all residents a seat at the table. 2) Work with local groups and community boards to look at zoning and traffic/transportation problems and bring forth solutions. 3) Use the duties of the public advocate to hold government accountable, make it more transparent and fight to make our city more affordable to live, work and start a business in.

Why I am a better choice than my opponent: I am not a cookie-cutter politician and will bring extensive government, small business and financial experience to the public advocate’s office. Unlike my opponent, I am not supported by special interests and I’m not a political insider. I am one of you, your neighbor and your friend, and I understand how important it is to have an independent voice in government. My plan for office can be found at alex2009.com/plan.

City Council District 6

Roughly covers the Upper West Side from West 56th to 96th streets

Incumbent: Gale Brewer, Democrat

Educational background: M.P.A, Kennedy School, Harvard University; B.A., Columbia University and Bennington College

Qualifications for office: I’ve represented the 6th district for eight years. My terrific staff and I have assisted thousands of constituents: saving people’s homes, creating jobs, protecting our quality of life, and writing laws to make government more open. After 40 years as a West Sider, and three decades in public service, the private sector, non-profits and Community Board 7, I know the diversity of the West Side and how to represent it.

Three goals I’d most want to accomplish during my next term: 1) Reduce school overcrowding and offer students more choice in middle and high schools; 2) Protect our affordable housing, require it in many new buildings and stop illegal hotels that take units off the market; 3) Preserve and bring back neighborhood mom-and-pop stores.

How I voted on term limits and why: I voted against it, and supported a ballot referendum to let the public decide. The vote was 29-22; I was in the minority. New Yorkers had made their views clear in two referendums and should have been given the chance to do so again. I have always believed, however, that a 12-year term makes a Council Member a more effective representative. You need that long to complete large and complex projects like the multi-million dollar renovations of St. Agnes Library, 59th Street Recreation Center, Harmony Atrium and the new Frank McCourt High School. In large part I am running for a third term to finish what I’ve started, and bring these projects to fruition.

Challenger: Joshua Goldberg, Republican

Educational background: Pace University (1986-1990) with a double major in journalism and political science. I have a keen interest in history and politics in general and New York particularly. I like to say I am also a graduate of “Dad University.” My father, Sidney Goldberg, was brilliant with a steel-trap intellect and wit.

Qualifications for office: I am independent. I have funded my campaign only with individual contributions and have taken NO money from special interests, political action committees, unions or public matching funds. I have what some have called an “encyclopedic” knowledge of New York City history and politics. I am a lifelong Upper West Sider. I have held a number of quintessentially “New York jobs,” from working at the Fulton Fish Market, Yellow Cab, the New York Post’s “Page Six,” sales for the  New York Press and I am a licensed New York City tour guide. I have worked on several local campaigns, too. Also, I know intimately what it is like navigating the health care system in New York due to my wife’s chronic illness (sickle cell anemia.)

Three goals I’d most want to accomplish during my first term: 1) Get control of the budget and the wasteful, run-away spending. 2) Reform the way the Council does business by making the position of Council member a full-time job and eliminating non-profit political slush funds. 3) Take control of the subways from the MTA (Albany) and give it back to the city. New York needs to have control over its own transit system that is the life-blood of the local economy.

The incumbent’s biggest failing: Two things: her willingness to house dangerous felons and sex offenders in residential, family neighborhoods and her defiance of the public will by running for a third term even after she came out very strongly in favor of keeping term limits. She cynically voted to keep term limits while on the floor of the Council but acts in opposition to her record.

City Council District 9

Covers a sliver of the Upper West Side from Broadway to the Hudson River between West 96th and 110th streets

Incumbent: Inez Dickens, Democrat

Educational background: I am a product of the New York City public school system. I also studied urban development and land economics at New York University and Howard University.

Qualifications for office: For over 30 years, I have actively been involved with the political process. I believe that the power of the ballot can improve the quality of our lives and the environments in which we live. I volunteered in community service organizations before I was elected to office. During my first term in office, I focused on creating affordable housing opportunities and improving infrastructures of community service organizations, especially in the area of public health issues related to our children.

Three goals I’d most want to accomplish during my next term: 1) Create more affordable housing opportunities. 2) Improve access to financing for small business enterprises. 3) Jobs and job training programs for young people (emancipated youth) and adults, along with educational enrichment programs for our children.

How I voted on term limits and why: I voted to extend term limits because I have always been against term limits. I believe in the power of the vote, and that is how you can exercise term limits. Furthermore, I believe that term limits disenfranchise people of color, as term limits can prevent people of color in office from attaining seniority and significant leadership positions.

Challenger: Abbi Lee Rogers-Haff, Republican

Educational background: University of Hard Knocks, New York, N.Y., business management and administration, accountancy, marketing.

Qualifications for office: Entrepreneur experience: negotiate government and corporate contracts to promote sales, eliminate competition and the bid process; write proposals and opportunity to bid according to rules, regulations and government codes of law. White-collar undercover investigator for national clothing manufacturer—became consultant to create a system of checks and balances to prevent embezzlement and theft. Professional experience: national general manager for the United States division of an international company based in the United Kingdom. Real estate building manager responsible for 50 exclusive residential buildings, Douglas, Elliman Gibbons & Ives.

Three goals I’d most want to accomplish during my first term: I propose to “follow the money” and regulate wasteful spending by the Council for purposes that are self-serving, special-interest and a conflict-of-interest. Power to the people! I will serve the district full time as City Councilwoman, attend community meetings and create a system of communication between the community and Council to represent my constituents in an efficient manner. Review proposed affordable housing to be income-targeted, based on median income in the district, with a percentage of affordable professional/retail space allocated to small businesses in the district at a reduced lease amount. This concept will deter the displacement of residents and small businesses.

The incumbent’s biggest failing: Councilwoman Inez Dickens does not represent the residents of District 9. Councilwoman Dickens voted against her constituents, in favor of extending term limits to Mayor Bloomberg, and in favor of the 125th Street rezoning plan. In addition, the Council budgeted $600,000 for the Metropolitan NY Coordinating Council on Jewish Poverty, Councilwoman Dickens budgeted $100,000 in her name only, and $5,000 for the Harlem Little League.

Joe Mendola

Republican Running for City Comptroller
The city comptroller has to manage an $80 billion pension fund for retirees and taxpayers—which makes it key for the person to be independent, says Joe Mendola.

In the past, the city’s chief financial officers have used the office to pave the way for a mayoral bid, Mendola notes, which means the fiscal interests of New Yorkers are not a top priority.

“If you’re managing pension funds and using the office as a stepping stone, you’ll use those funds to placate interest groups,” he said.

Like most Republicans running for office this November, one quality Mendola touts is his independence from interest groups and not being a career politician.

He criticized his Democratic opponent, Queens Council Member John Liu, for being a political insider who will use the comptroller’s office to repay campaign favors from special interest groups. Liu, like his predecessors, will only use the office as a springboard to Gracie Mansion, Mendola argues.

“If you take politics out of the office, I can make investments based solely on what’s responsible,” he said.

A lifelong Democrat who lives in Greenwich Village, Mendola registered as a Republican right before the November 2008 elections. He said he felt more comfortable with Republicans on fiscal issues and called the federal stimulus package a “waste of taxpayer money.”

Professionally, Mendola is a compliance officer who makes sure that investments are in line with regulation. That experience means he is the only qualified candidate running for the office, he says.

“I know the [Securities and Exchange Commission] laws. I know the funds my company invests in comply with the rules,” he said. “I have the skills the comptroller needs.”

If elected, Mendola said he would increase transparency by posting investment returns online, as well as the names of outside consultants that are used in the office.

“We need to bring accountability and transparency to the system,” he said.

Mendola also wants to aggressively audit city agencies and examine the use of outside contractors.

“They’ve got to go in there with a fine tooth comb and make sure we’re getting our money’s worth,” he said. “The system needs to be cleansed, needs to be reformed.”

Alex Zablocki

Republican Running for Public Advocate
When Alex Zablocki meets a voter who has no clue what the public advocate is, he hands them a business card detailing the position. For the record, the public advocate is an ombudsman, an independent check on City Hall who fields citizens’ complaints.

Zablocki, who at 26 is the youngest person to run for this office, wants the public advocate to be more community oriented. He would open a satellite office in every borough, plus one in northern Manhattan, and promises to be an active member of Council committees.

“The outer boroughs need a voice, someone that will stand up for regular people,” he said.

Zablocki is a Staten Islander and aide to his local state senator, Andrew Lanza, a Republican. Though Zablocki is socially liberal, he is opposed to onerous regulations that he says hurt small business. He criticized City Council bills that impose paid sick leave, require most restaurants to post calorie information and fine stores for leaving the door open while air conditioning is in use.

“All of these things are burdensome on small business at the wrong time,” he said. “The City Council should be looking at making it easier for small businesses to open.”

If elected, Zablocki wants reform the office that was created in 1993, even taking away some of its power. He wants to strip the public advocate from being next in line for mayor, but give the office some teeth by arming the public advocate with subpoena power.

While the public advocate is thought to be a thorn in the side of the mayor, Zablocki also wants to be a check on the Democratic-dominated Council that currently includes his opponent, Democrat Bill de Blasio.

“He also comes from the same City Council that I feel needs to be held accountable,” Zablocki said of de Blasio. “I think we need a voice that will be completely independent from City Council.”

David Casavis

Republican Running for Manhattan Borough President
The slogan for David Casavis’ borough president campaign is “David Can-Save-Us.” And what he wants to save us from is the borough presidency itself.

Casavis, an Upper East Sider, is running for a position that he feels is a useless piece of bureaucracy and a waste of taxpayer money.

The borough presidents, who used to sit on the Board of Estimate, once held great sway over land use and budgetary matters. But in 1989, the Supreme Court ruled that the Board of Estimate gave too much power to less populous boroughs and diverted most of the borough presidents’ authority to the City Council.

“It is a vestigial organ. It’s left over,” Casavis said. “It’s only the bully pulpit.”

His opponent, incumbent Manhattan Borough President Scott Stringer, might disagree. Wielding policy papers and studies, Stringer has been able to squeeze power out of an office that has little official responsibility. According to the City Charter, the borough president must give an advisory opinion on large developments before they go to the City Planning Commission, appoint half of the borough’s community board members and make appointments to various boards, including those that govern city planning and pension funds.

Casavis, however, sees the borough presidency differently.

“Your job is to keep your face in the camera,” he said.

A Manhattan Republican Party foot soldier, Casavis says he wants to be elected so he can start dismantling the office, ultimately saving the city $60 million. Instead of hiring staff, he would hire lawyers to devise a plan to end the borough presidency, likely through a charter commission.

Though other Republican borough president candidates are rejecting Casavis’ manifesto, he says GOP candidates for City Council are heeding his call. Better yet, voters are open to the idea.

“If I talk to every single voter, I could win with 75 percent. This is enormous, this is universal,” Casavis said. “Everybody I speak with, even people who are loyal Democrats, say, ‘What does the borough president do?’”

If Casavis loses his race, he hopes to continue his crusade. For only a dollar, he would serve on the charter commission to fight against the borough presidency.

Joshua Goldberg

Republican Running for City Council District 6

Republicans will always have an incredibly difficult time running a race in the very progressive Upper West Side—Joshua Goldberg, perhaps, even more so.

Goldberg’s brother Jonah is the conservative writer who authored Liberal Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left from Mussolini to the Politics of Meaning. His mother, Lucianne, convinced Linda Tripp to record her conversations with Monica Lewinsky, which almost brought down President Bill Clinton during his impeachment.

Goldberg, however, says that he never adopted that brand of conservatism.

“I tend to be more moderate than the rest of my family,” he said.

Goldberg, a former double-decker bus tour guide who currently manages his mother’s news website, entered the race at the behest of local Republican district leaders.

“This year there is a big opportunity here,” Goldberg said. “Firstly, people are really upset with the Council knuckling under and taking away term limits without the voters’ consent.”

Though his opponent, incumbent Council Member Gale Brewer, voted against the term limits extension bill, Goldberg criticized her for waiting until the last minute to make her position known. He also knocked Brewer for running for a third term after she voted against the term limit extension legislation.

Other than that vote, though, Goldberg respects Brewer as a public servant and lauded her constituent services operation. In this heavily Democratic district, Brewer is all but assured to be re-elected.

“Believe me, I know this is a quixotic quest, so to speak,” Goldberg said. “I am under no illusions to what I’m up against.”

But he is running to give residents in the district—which roughly covers the Upper West Side from West 56th to 96th streets—a choice between the incumbent and a candidate who will bring down taxes and spending.

Goldberg considers cracking 20 percent of the vote a victory for fiscal responsibility.

“If somebody is concerned about taxes and runaway spending in the city, they should vote for me as opposed to Gale Brewer,” Goldberg said.

Abbi Lee Rogers

Republican Running for City Council District 9
Abbi Lee Rogers has a laundry list of complaints against her Democratic opponent, Council Member Inez Dickens, who represents District 9.

Topping her list of grievances is Dickens’ support for extending term limits; Rogers would have preferred a public referendum to determine any changes to the term limits law.

Next on the complaint list would be the controversial rezoning of 125th Street in Harlem, which Dickens supported and helped shape. Rogers feels the new rezoning plan will drastically change the neighborhood and displace residents.

“I don’t like the fact that 125th Street was rezoned against the will of the people,” she said.

If elected, Rogers said she wants to reallocate discretionary money—known as member items—to organizations that specifically serve the Harlem district. While Dickens has showered money on her district, Rogers feels there are some organizations outside of Harlem that have benefited from the incumbent’s largesse.

“I don’t like the politics in Harlem and I don’t like the politics in the City Council,” she said.

The district covers a sliver of the Upper West Side from Broadway to the Hudson River between West 96th and 110th streets.

Rogers, a fifth-generation Harlemite and second vice president of the Harlem Republican Club, has business and administrative experience as the former head of the United States division of furniture manufacturer Arenson International, which is based in the United Kingdom. She has also managed 50 co-op buildings in Manhattan.

When it comes to education, Rogers wants the cap on charter schools to be lifted and criticized Dickens for limiting their growth.

“If charter schools are succeeding, why are we stifling them?” she said.

Still, she is running an uphill battle in this Democratic district to make a stand against the usual politics in Harlem.

“I’m sick and tired of being sick and tired and watching it go by year after year,” Rogers said.