<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NYPress.com - New York&#039;s essential guide to culture, arts, politics, news and more &#187; Bolton&#8217;s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nypress.com/tag/boltons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nypress.com</link>
	<description>New York&#039;s essential guide to culture, arts, politics, news and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 21:16:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Solving the Fur, Faux and Real, Dilemma</title>
		<link>http://nypress.com/solving-the-fur-faux-and-real-dilemma/</link>
		<comments>http://nypress.com/solving-the-fur-faux-and-real-dilemma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NY Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Our Town]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Town]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bolton's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Calvin Klein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faux fur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laura shanahan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loehmann's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Midtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rabbit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T.J. Maxx]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nypress.com/?p=60581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Laura Shanahan Would you rather go naked than wear fur, as per the models in the famous anti-fur ad campaign? (I always had a problem with that question: Does it have to be either/or? Can’t I just choose to wear, y’know, regular clothes?) Well, whether you wouldn’t dream of wearing fur—or dream of wearing ]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Laura Shanahan</p>
<p>Would you rather go naked than wear fur, as per the models in the famous anti-fur ad campaign? (I always had a problem with that question: Does it have to be either/or? Can’t I just choose to wear, y’know, regular clothes?)</p>
<p>Well, whether you wouldn’t dream of wearing fur—or dream of wearing fur—this season has seen an explosion of both faux and for-real versions; particularly, though, of the former. You know your position, so pick your preference.</p>
<p>Problem is, you may not always know what you’re buying, and price can be an inaccurate indicator. Case in point: I spotted a pair of plush animal-print earmuffs selling in Midtown for $7.99, about as low-ball a figure as you can find. “Faux fur” read the affixed sticker. Would there be any doubt in your mind that given the price and the sticker, these are indeed a pretend product?</p>
<p>Of course not—but there should be. Upon careful inspection, I noticed a sewn-in label stating “100 percent rabbit fur, made in China.” Yeeks. I pointed out the problem to the seller who seemed dismayed, but not surprised: “Rabbit is cheap,” she shrugged. How sad is that? The life of a sentient creature: cheap; cheaper than polyester pile.</p>
<p>I’m not singling out any one seller for two reasons: The problem is not limited to a single merchant and, second, the fact that the earmuffs’ contradictory sewn-in tag wasn’t snipped out suggests there was no deliberate subterfuge. The takeaway here is caveat emptor. Read all labels, trust your instincts and know that the more established and reputable a brand and retailer are, the likelier it is that you’re buying what you think you are.</p>
<p>A fabulous source of top-name faux-fur finds is Bolton’s. Have you also overlooked this humble but quintessential circa-40-year-old local discount chain (easily predating, in Manhattan, Loeh<br />
mann’s, T.J. Maxx and other more out-there names)? It wasn’t until our recent biannual pilgrimage to the nonpareil jewelry department at Bergdorf Goodman that I found myself, after a long hiatus, peeking into the nearby Bolton’s at 27 W. 57th.</p>
<p>Yowza: Calvin Klein earmuffs fashioned of chocolate-and-gold-spotted pretend fur attached to a leather-like band for just $19.99—the manufacturer’s suggested retail price-tag of $40 is still attached. Klein’s kind-to-animals version sports a discreetly sized gold-metal plaque bearing his name on one side of the band.</p>
<p>Prefer earmuffs in a solid black? Another Klein version here for the same price has the band and ear coverings wrapped in a velvety rich facsimile of beaver pelt; just so you know, the plaque is a bit buried in this model’s piled band.</p>
<p>Evelyn K weighs in with a circular 30-inches-all-around “eternity scarf”—yup, big enough to lasso some waistlines—in a kitten-soft black, brown and coffee-colored plush pile that’s pure Polly Esther; $7.95.</p>
<p>For all-over warmth, consider the spectacular Jones New York whiskey-colored mink-look-alike coat with fit-and-flare shaping, thanks to the multi-tiers sewn in below the waist. This glamorous, approximately knee-length garment has the practical, updating feature of a hood. Its already low price of $159.99 is further discounted 20 percent (perhaps more by the time you read this), and that includes the usual luxury touch of spare buttons.</p>
<p>Are you also kicking yourself for habitually zipping past Bolton’s en route to flashier/newer/trendier stores? Personally, I’m going to wear a (faux) hair shirt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nypress.com/solving-the-fur-faux-and-real-dilemma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
