Snobby Savvy Slivka; Crabby Tabb; Cabal's a Lying Elephant-Hater; Slackjaw, Our Hero; MUGGER's Right About Molly; Exciting and Inciting
ONT FACE="Plantin Bold"> Andrey Slivkas article on the Webbys ("Webbys 2001," 8/1) was pretty much dead-on (especially the part about an entire generations capitulation to the money culture); on the other hand, its gotten pretty hip these days to heap ridicule on laid-off Web workers. Keep in mind that a lot of low-end website employees really did get screwed. Maybe not the yahoos at the Webbys, but definitely the ill-paid receptionists, assistants and customer support workers who were making $30K and under even during the dotcom boom.
Its a much worse scene, regardless of race, when you get bounced out of a low-status, low-qualification $27-grand-a-year job (especially in cities like New York or San Francisco with their ridiculously inflated costs of living) to discover that the "economic downturn" means that finding another equally crappy job will be three times as hard. Heres hoping the soup lines stay in the 1930s, but some dotcom casualties have grimmer prospects ahead than grad school.
Name Withheld, via Internet
Maybe Too Hip?
I dont know that Ive ever read a more priggish, snotty piece of writing in my life than Andrey Slivkas piece on the Webby awards. Not that I have anything against making fun of the SF dotcommer crowd. Working in printing all my life, I have my own issues with the Internet industry and its destroy-the-old-dinosaurs mentality. A note: printing plants are closing all over the country. This would make Slivka sad, I suppose, considering that the people whose jobs are lost when a printing plant closes are nice, easy-to-sympathize-with working-class-type folks. Probably even some blacks, although maybe not the type who would appreciate a degrading comparison to some rich white partygoers for some self-righteous writers next paragraph.
But the central problem with the piece is that it is just so goddamn easy to write a snide little article about rich little turds and why their problems are meaningless. All the precious little comments about "whiteboys" and "whitegirls." Of course these people are shameless, horrible little fucks. But honestly, who cares? Who gives a fuck? Catering to the schadenfreude of others is not a good theme for a cover story. There should have been some meat in there.
Thanks for the Caldwell, La Badarian, Strausbaugh and Knipfel, though.
Caleb Wright, Brooklyn
Detail Man
I especially enjoyed and savored M. Wartellas excellent "Stone Oven" pizza gag on this weeks cover (8/1).
Name Withheld, Manhattan
Letter of the Week
I have always picked up New York Press looking forward to articles written by Jim Knipfel. It was a wonderful surprise to come to your website and find that Jim is an energetic contributor to your "Daily Billboard" section. When Jim is not published in your weekly tome, I find comfort in knowing I can view his wonderful insights posted on nypress.com. Kudos to all your staff for producing one of the most readable and energetic newspapers in this cluttered field. Please pass on to your advertisers that this reader uses New York Press as the first resource for my buying needs. If you want, I can list purchases from "inch.com" (old ad) to Metro AirTek.
P.S. I love you too, MUGGER.
John E. Schloss, Brooklyn
From a Former Poser
I just finished reading Slackjaw, and I was totally blown away. Awesome book. Just wanted to give my praise to Jim Knipfel. I grew up in Madison and was an alternative HS poser-punkette for the whole late 1980s scene there. The NWP were my heroes: their "form of protest without the content" march to this day makes me bust up. Also, kudos to Andrey Slivka on the "Webby" story–I live in the smoking husk of dotcomville, and appreciate the take.
Candace Cardinal, San Francisco
Wheres Cecil?
Looks like you forgot to put "The Straight Dope" in last weeks issue of New York Press. Please dont forget it next week.
Barry N. Sher, Manhattan
Hey, MUGGIE Boy!
MUGGER: I just read the "Pickin Up the Pieces" bit (8/1). For this effort, the selection committee has awarded you the Ed Norton Prize and Medal, named in honor of the New York City worker from Jackie Gleasons tv show. The citation reads: "Each week you courageously climb down into the sewer of Political Writing and watch the turds drift by, netting the biggest floaters and proudly displaying their putrid contents."
How do you do it? They cant pay you enough to read this stuff. As you say, look at them: From Alter and Fineman, to Times Margaret Carlson, the entire staff of The New York Times, Slates Jacob Weisberg, Salons Jake Tapper, The Wall Street Journals Al Hunt, NBCs Tim Russert, Hardballs Chris Matthews, The Washington Posts Dana Milbank, E.J. Dionne and Richard Cohen, and The Weekly Standards Bill Kristol and David Brooks, this is a repulsive crew of toads and weasels.
In addition to the award, please accept my personal thanks as well. Without your ceaseless efforts, I would never know how disgraceful the idiot press is. I could guess, and Id be right, but Id never really know, cause I wouldnt read that shit on a bet. But I eagerly await your column each Wednesday. Whats more, Im cruising through The Wall Street Journal and I start reading a well-written and thought-out piece on a book Ill never read about Tina and Harry. Somethings familiar, so I look at the byline. "Is that New York Press Russ Smith? Sure writes and thinks like him." Sure enough its you. Nice work.
P.S. Go Sox. We were in Boston for the 86 debacle and to this day my bride is eager to provide Bill Buckner with the attractive piano wire necktie if she ever gets her hands on him.
Jim Klein, San Francisco
Low Blow
George Tabb: As a faithful reader of New York Press for many years now, I have endured your stories for quite a while. The latest one about the first time you got crabs ("Music, 8/1) had me laughing at you, not with you. I think now is the time you should write about your first blowjob and tell everyone who cares if your jaw still hurts.
Nina Hunter, Coney Island
Too Much Information
Alan Cabal says hes been spending too much time in his apartment ("New York City," 7/25). Too bad he didnt spend it becoming informed about circuses with animals. Elephants and big cats like tigers and lions "perform" only through fear of their trainers. Why else would they jump through a ring of fire? It is a fact that the USDA has charged the Clyde Beatty-Cole Bros. Circus with violating the Animal Welfare Act in its abusive treatment of elephants. It is a fact that the Monmouth County, NJ, SPCA has charged CBCBC with cruelty to animals. Elephants stand on their heads only because of fear of the bull-hook used to beat them into submission. Three of the CBCBC elephants have died in less than two years. I guess Cabal thinks they were killed with kindness.
When all those happy humans go home after watching a show filled with stupid animal tricks coerced by beatings, the animals go back into their cramped cages where they live most of their lives. Why is taking wild animals taken from their natural environments and forcing them to perform stupid tricks "Good Old American Entertainment"? Sounds like Good Old American Cruelty to me.
Sheila M. Richardson, Woodside
Courting Stereotypes
Stereotypes are great, arent they? According to Alan Cabal, if you dont want animals to be beaten or otherwise abused, you apparently become a "puerile ninny" and an "idiot" involved in "dipshit pursuits like PETA and ALF."
I see. The least Mr. Cabal could do is get his facts straight. First of all, the USDA does not give the Clyde Beatty circus a clean bill of health. They have, in fact, issued multiple citations and violations. Bull-hooks are used on elephants and four elephants have died in the past four years. If Cabal would sit down in a face-to-face meeting with some of us "puerile ninnies," perhaps we could share with him the painful facts behind the lives of circus animals.
Robin Jacobson, Manhattan
Let Us Guess: Four Elephants? Bull-hooks?
I am writing in response to Alan Cabals article entitled "Real American Circus." Mr. Cabal does not have his facts straight. He seems to think that the USDA inspectors have placed their stamp of approval on Clyde Beattys treatment of animals. In reality, Clyde Beatty has received many USDA citations and violations including abusive use of bull-hooks on elephants. But reality does not seem to be a plane that Mr. Cabal visits too often. He seems to be overdosing on nostalgia; his article reads as if he is itching for his delusional "good ol days."
He trivializes animal activists because, in his words, "they presume to denounce any sort of working relationship between man and beast." This further exemplifies his detachment from reality. The relationship between people who work for the circus and circus animals is nowhere near equal and is in no way comparable to an employer/ employee "work" relationship. It is much more analogous to the master/slave relationship. Maybe Mr. Cabal would take no offense at that kind master/slave relationship either. His "good ol days" nostalgic lust seems to be founded in exploitation anyway. Maybe he also misses the days when circuses paraded people as freaks, people like "the bearded lady," etc.–because thats what Cabals exalted "authentic traditional American circus" did.
Personally, I have worked briefly for the Cirque du Soleil, which does not have animals. I am an advocate of these kinds of circuses, the ones that do no harm to animals.
Joanna Marzullo, Bronx
Alan Cabal replies: Clyde Beatty-Cole Bros. Circus is, like any circus, comprised of a number of individual acts. While it is true that in the past there have been abuses perpetrated against animals by certain unethical and unsavory performers under contract with the show, the management of CBCBC has taken a very firm position against abusive animal-handling techniques and is currently operating a clean and humane show as per the USDA and my own observation. The show goes into winter quarters and takes a break every year from Thanksgiving to March. Adam Hills elephant partners consist of Bessie, 56 years old; Tina, 35 years old; and Jewel, 37 years old. Elephants in the wild generally live to be 30-35 years old, assuming they can manage to avoid the poachers. To suggest that these highly intelligent animals need to be coerced to perform is preposterous. They enjoy the applause and appreciate the catering as much as their human partners do.
NRA on His Deathbed
I was glad to see that Armond White appreciated Charlton Hestons cameo appearance in Tim Burtons reinterpretation of Planet of the Apes ("Film," 8/1). I am quite surprised, however, that he didnt note the subtler and more meaningful subtext to Hestons apes deathbed speech.
When Heston says: "Against this [technology] our physical strength means nothing," he isnt blasting guns as forces that foster chaos, hes praising them as tools of social change. Look at that same statement from the perspective of the humans (or any downtrodden group). With guns, slavery can be abolished. Guns are cast as the great equalizer, a tool for the oppressed with which to fight for freedom. In other words, Chuck Heston, even with all his self-effacing buffoonery, still manages to pump out the NRA party line.
In addition, bless you New York Press for including Matt Zoller Seitzs reviews. He deserves nothing less than constant praise.
Tal Kedem, Manhattan
Prancing Monahan
While it seems incredible that an upper-crusty Franco-Armenian like Claude La Badarian would recognize a claddagh ring if he saw one ("Dining Late with Claude La Badarian," 8/1)–when he scrawls about his fascination with the "little people," does he mean leprechauns?–its nothing less than hilarious to read the latest resentful description of his rival–a grown man, I assume–sporting that garish accessory–not the backpack, by the way–or the rum and Coke, come to think of it–so long favored by vaginismustic Catholic schoolgirls.
If its any comfort, Mr. La Badarian, it sounds as if youre not having quite all of Monahans problems for him. I hope youll let us know–that is, if you can quell your seething envy for long enough–when he shows up at the bar wearing a hiked-up Campbell skirt and barrettes.
Ken Hagan, Bronx
Rim Shot
Regarding George Tabbs latest column in your music section ("Music," 8/1), I would just like to say that I, too, got crabs from a dirty hotel bed in Mexico. At least thats what I tell my girlfriend.
Sydney Ripley, Manhattan
A Musical Joke
Thoroughly enjoyed "Old Smoke" once again (7/18 and 8/1). But I couldnt help noticing a slight discrepancy: At the beginning of Part 1, William Bryk says that Daniel Sickles made Lorenzo Da Pontes acquaintance in 1839; but at the end of Part 2, we learn that Da Ponte died in 1838. If its not too nitpicky, Id like to ask, which is it?
Ronald MacKinnon, Manhattan
The editors reply: Sickles made the acquaintance of the younger Lorenzo Da Ponte in 1839.
Blood Feud
George Szamuely: I do not believe that sins of the fathers should be revisited on the sons, but one with your name–descendant of the infamous Tibor Szamuely–should not take the side of that degenerate tyrant and murderer Mugabe ("Takis Top Drawer," 7/25)! Then, your "immunity" evaporates and all the bad things the name Tibor Szamuely brings to mind can be turned against you. I would think twice if I were you before cheering terrorists and murderers. (This is not to be easy on the gangster regime of Horthy that followed the Commune; that is another filthy chapter of the many filthy chapters that are the history of Hungary.) In a similar situation I would advise any Horthy descendant–should he make common cause with any bloody dictator.
Robert Peter Held, via Internet
George Szamuely replies: I dont hold my head in shame on account of my great-uncle. While I would not defend everything he did, two things need to be kept in mind. First, in 1919 a defeated, disarmed Hungary was the victim of Western-inspired invasions by the Romanians and the Czechs, each of whom had been promised large chunks of Hungarian land as reward. As Deputy Commissar for War of the Hungarian Soviet Republic, my great-uncle achieved the near-impossible feat of mobilizing the country and–at least for a time–fighting off the invading armies. However, given the forces arrayed against Hungary, defeat was inevitable and my great-uncle paid for his defiance with his life. Second, the chaos in which Hungary found itself in 1919 was not caused by men like my great-uncle, but by the supposedly respectable politicians who recklessly led their countries into the disastrous 1914-18 war.
Never Too Many Reasons
How tremendous to see that Mimi Kramer has taken over the theater column ("Theater," 8/1). She is a bold, intelligent and entertaining writer and will bring your theater page up to the level of your cinema coverage, which has always been awesome. Though I didnt need one, you have provided me with another reason to read New York Press.
Travis Stewart, Brooklyn
That Blos Us Away!
MUGGER: Are you aware of the Blohards, a Red Sox fan club here in New York? The formal name is "Benevolent Loyal Order Of The Honorable Ancient Red Sox Die Hard Sufferers Of New York." We have periodic meetings with lots to drink and eat. The team usually provides speakers when theyre in town.
Vern Trotter, Manhattan
After We Wake Him Up
MUGGER: Please add Don Imus to the list of shills (8/1).
Carol Hunter, Shreveport, LA
More Trotskyites in the Media
MUGGER: I loved your article–especially your references to Molly Ivins and Jim Hightower (8/1). On the subject of President Bush, my wife and I cannot understand why he is not all over the country selling his programs and positions and giving it straight to the American public instead of expecting them to get it from the Marxist media. Its a real puzzlement.
Gus Doering, Cedar Park, TX
Another Baltimoron Who Doesnt Like Us
MUGGER: You are aptly named if the victim of the mugging you refer to is journalistic quality. I checked out New York Press expecting to find some of the best commentary going. After all, this is "if you can make it here you can make it anywhere" New York City and this is an independent paper (which should attract the best of the truly independent writers).
But what do I find? The same tiresome substitution of vitriol for wit, knockdowns for commentary and tired rehashes (dished up under new names like blue plate specials at a really bad diner) in place of fresh perspectives. In fact, MUGGER shouldnt be singled out. The whole paper is a sad disappointment and cant begin to hold a candle to Detroits Metrotimes, Baltimores City Paper, the Philadelphia Weekly or, incredible as it may seem, the occasional offering from the Austin Chronicle. The saddest thing of all is that there have got to be some topnotch writers roaming New York, un- or under-employed.
Cheryl Adam, Baltimore
Nothin But Cock
I was scouring my Internet bookmarks trying to find news sources not obsessed with Gary Condits penis and thought Id glance through New York Press. Why would a NYC-based publication care about a Left Coast politician, I thought. Wrong again. Christopher Caldwell was right there ("Hill of Beans," 8/1), obsessing like a Sunday morning pundit whore, wringing every last nuance out of the scraps of news and innuendo (mostly the latter) that had emerged over the previous week.
What were you thinking? How can you possibly believe your readers want more of this crap? Are New Yorkers so sex-starved and naive they find this media-driven feeding-frenzy to be interesting? The worst part of the Clinton scandals was the entire press submerging itself in the disgusting personal lives of our political leaders from both sides of the aisle. Its hardly a secret that our current speaker of the House has his job because he was (apparently) the only non-gay GOP member of Congress who wasnt screwing around. Now we find that Gary Condit, a longtime political crossdresser, is a potential suspect in an interns disappearance. I suppose I should be grateful. Just today I erased three bookmarks because they led to websites that couldnt stop obsessing about someones penis. In the future, I wont have to waste anymore time at New York Press, Kausfiles or ABC News.
I will still visit Drudge, however. If Im going to have to hear about penises (penii?) I might as well go to the mother of all cock-obsessed websites. With Drudge, I know what Im getting; I thought New York Press was better than that. I was wrong.
Mark Gisleson, St. Paul, MN
Say Hi to Keely
MUGGER: What do you think about the dredging of the Hudson? How come Murray/Hamburger emphasized the "legal" aspect of the case in the WSJ and not the moral? Do you think morality has gotten too expensive? Sure, it was legal at the time to release PCBs into the Hudson, but so what? GE can afford to do the right thing and clean up the Hudson and do it right.
Isnt that what compassionate conservatism is all about?
Louie Prima, Staatsburg, NY
Jims a Prince
Re Jim Knipfels "Paying Off Some Karmic Debts" ("e-Slackjaw," 8/1). That article was so touching–he writes so well that you can almost feel like you saw the incident happen. I know he will probably cringe at my saying this, but he comes across as being a lovely fellow. Thank you for a wonderful reading experience.
Hester Nichols, via Internet
Babbitt Won
I am still laughing at Andrey Slivkas diatribe against us Mid-American dupes ("Daily Billboard, 7/24). Andrey: Sinclair Lewis was born in Sauk Centre, MN. Guess you didnt hear Babbitt won and he has a really cool car. I would really recommend a trip out of your Left Coast city. Just recently people have moved to uninhabitable desert places like Phoenix and Las Vegas...shucks, we even have newspapers now and some of us have even lernt to read.
Thomas M. Paynter, Las Vegas
Honky Talkin
Tim Hall: There is always "ice people," thanks to Leonard Jeffries ("Daily Billboard," 7/26). Of course, the problem with "ice people" is that it actually sounds too cool to be much of an insult. "Ice people," and the silly theory behind it, inspires visions of invincible Vikings, British naval officers and Roman soldiers traveling around the world, thrashing numberless hordes of the best that the Americas, Africa and Asia can produce. And what does "sun people," the Jeffries nomenclature for the sensitive and warmhearted people who live near the equator, make one think of? Right, a bunch of half-naked lazy guys, lying on their asses on the beach sipping out of coconuts while those nasty ice people are writing The Iliad, inventing the machine gun and building cathedrals and skyscrapers. I hope somebody comes up with something better, and look forward to a list in New York Press.
Mitchell Glodek, Manhattan
Like a Phoenix
Sometimes Alexander Cockburn rises above his leftist proclivities. But then he reverts to type, as in his recent "Wild Justice" (7/25) column. He parrots the line that a lawsuit successfully charged that the USDA discriminated against black farmers.
The actual facts belie these left-liberal pieties. The USDA instigated and then acquiesced in a fraudulent settlement with black farmers engaged in white-collar crime. I would refer those who care about the facts of the case to the February 2001 issue of American Renaissance.
Daniel Hayes, Rego Park
Alexander Cockburn replies: This is ludicrous. Black farmers have been screwed ever since Reconstruction and there are hundreds of reports and articles and court decisions buttressing that simple fact. It doesnt matter which decade you pick. For example, Reagan tried to quell the legitimate gripes of black farmers by the simple expedient of closing down the civil-rights complaint division of the USDA. The real enemy is corporate agriculture. Small white farming families have endless gripes too. But they are spared the racism.
Bar-B-Q Aint No Joke
Alexander Cockburn writes: "In Columbus, TX, Jerry Mikeskas Bar-B-Q sign announces SEVEN DAYS WITHOUT BARBQ MAKES ONE WEAK. In the old days that probably would have read Makes a Man Weak. Not anymore..." ("Wild Justice," 8/1).
Does this mean Texans are sheepishly correct these days, or that they dont even understand the simple jokes they make? Does Cockburn? Its a pun, son.
Thomas Cogan, Sunnyside
A Gentleman Never Tells
Alexander Cockburn seems to refer to the key women in George W. Bushs life on a regular basis. Weve been told more than once that he found George W.s mother to be a particularly nasty woman. On the other hand, he seems to find Laura Bush divine, perhaps because of the "vulgar gossip" about her "racy 20s." Sounds fine to me, but what exactly does he know about both women that we dont?
Todd Kenyon, Brooklyn
The Careful Reader
Re: Alexander Cockburns "From New Orleans to Midland" (8/1): The "scrubby old state highway" is not "Interstate 90" or even a state highway–its U.S. 90. Interstate 90 runs from Seattle to Boston.
Also, "...a daily production potential of 2.2 million barrels a day." As opposed to a daily production potential of 2.2 million barrels a week?
Paul Sepe, Plymouth, NH
Both, Frequently
Takis mongrel-like pursuit of women, continuously announced and bragged about, leads me to believe that it is his ego and not his penis that is being catered to.
Marie Caesar, Bronx
Down Mex-i-co Way
1995... Whatever happened to Zach Parsi?
Jennifer Spiegel, Phoenix
Gulping
Carol Iannones column ("Takis Top Drawer," 7/25) was an excellent piece on the misguiding influence of "feminism" on women who wish to be successful in and connected to all of life, not just to some strange, separate idea of a fiercely independent female warrior. Thank you, from a 31-year-old working female who likes guys. And, gulp, is dating one considerably her senior.
Shannon Stevens, Philadelphia
Maybe She Needs a Hard Lemonade
One of the disappointing things about your otherwise interesting newspaper is that your editors seem to think that occasional Gen-X bashing of the left is somehow cool. It is ironic I suppose, in that the generation that most fervently wanted to inspire a new moral consciousness in this country is succeeded by a generation that has absolutely no clue as to morality of any kind. (Quick example, the tv commercial where a loggers foot is amputated accidentally and his coworkers response is to invite him to have a glass of lemonade–its sad that anyone would think that that was funny, but its pretty representative of Gen-X humor.)
Getting back to the point and Carol Iannones article: First of all, the "con" of feminism is not that it falsely promises freedom for women, but that demands that men treat women as well as they do men, even though men havent even begun to figure out how to treat each other well.
The most disappointing and revealing example of the writers cluelessness is her statement that "most women...do want to please men, and realize their own highest human pleasure in giving themselves to one of them." Maybe Im nuts but I put playing with and teaching children, learning and/or creating something new, solving problems, building things, etc., right up there with great sex–if thats what the writers referring to. The reason Im sending this e-mail is that the columnists attitude manifests a level of spiritual depression that should be seen for what it is, namely a disease.
G.F. Hunt, Manhattan
The Satanic Frost?
MUGGER: Don Zimmer–the Gerbil–also blew the Cubs chances in the 1989 NLCS with his boneheaded managing (8/1). So if the Cubs and Bosox do meet in October, at least well have one thing in common.
Fred Butzen, Deerfield, IL
Not Deep in Your Heart
MUGGER: I read your reference in your column to Molly Ivins (8/1). I am absolutely appalled that we have to claim her as a Texan. She is, without a doubt, a blot on the reputation of Texas. I saw her once in the Denver airport and she looked like an unmade bed. I could not believe that anyone well known would go out in public looking like that.
Martha Hamby, Dallas
Once Is Never Enough
Today was the first time I read MUGGER. It will certainly not be the last. I loved it! Thanks.
Tom Trimble, Athens, GA
Seek and Ye Shall Find
So Charles Glass has finally found a good Jew; "heroic" even ("Takis Top Drawer," 8/1). He lavishes praise on the detestable Dr. Israel Shahak, who spent his entire adult life attempting to literally destroy Judaism and its offspring, the state of Israel. Shahaks writings on Talmud and Halacha (Jewish law) were so riddled with errors, half-truths and distortions that they made my eyes cross. Almost all Israelis ignored him or thought him either misguided or traitorous. He was famous for taking phrases of Talmud out of context and inserting his own personal interpretations to make them seem stupid/criminal/hard-hearted. He would then present the text as the thinking of not only the single rabbi who authored them, but of all Jews, everywhere, since time immemorial.
Shahak spent his life in an Israel that he described as "fascist," but continued to dwell in Israels Jewish cities. No apartment in the Arab neighborhoods of Jaffa for him. He continued to call himself "Jew" though he implied that the word itself was a "simile" for evil and manipulative. He (and Glass, in his column) called Israel "racist," even as it brought tens of thousands of Ethiopian Jews to its country, made them full citizens and has struggled to integrate them into its society; even as it invited thousands of African non-Jews to study in its country; even as it sent medical teams to treat the victims of African plagues and wars; even as it granted a hostile Arab minority full rights in its democracy.
It figures that Glass would idolize a self-hating, wretched little hypocrite like Shahak. He was an acceptable Jew.
Barry Schechter, East Brunswick, NJ
A Grateful German
This is a response to David Manns letter "Whiny Europeans" in "The Mail" (7/25). I thank you for the Marshall Plan and most Germans who remember do too. I grew up in postwar Germany without traffic lights and very few cars. The only car I remember seeing was the one that took me to the hospital.
Go over there now! I think we live in a different world today, which should be seriously considered.
Brigitte Epple, Brooklyn
Bosh, Stuff and Nonsense
Once I lost track of the number of times I had written "bullshit" and (so help me) "bosh" in the margins of her piece, I realized that I had to respond to Carol Iannones annoying tripe ("Takis Top Drawer," 7/25). I presume that it was not intended as some hip attempt at irony or some lame kind of knowing wink.
Let me get this straight. For a woman, "the fulfillment of [her] own nature" consists in "giving herself to" a man? "To Serve Man" is no longer an intelligent and amusing Twilight Zone episode (or subsequent Simpsons riff on it) but the be-all and end-all of female existence? This would be delicious entertainment as a retro time-capsule glance at TV Land fare (Father Knows Best anyone?) but its just pititul, and, worse, damned aggravating as a sample of serious thought in the present.
"A womans goal should not be to deny her need for a man." Uh, hello? No lesbians on the planet? Stupid and offensive assumption to write them out of her script? Or are they just denying "their own nature"? "[B]oys have been tutored not to grow into good men but to become more like women"? Who scripted these roles? So biology is destiny, after all, and little things like society have nothing to do with the fact that some folks blindly accept gender-based roles as a given without asking who gave them. Iannone writes that feminism "did not teach [women] to know thyself, which is the primary requisite for happiness." Its a pity that she hasnt taken the time or expended any great effort, apparently, to know herself, either.
What makes her rant all the more infuriating is the dismissal of the demon "feminism" as "part of the problem." Who are these monolithic "feminists" of whom Iannone writes? The ones on whose shoulders she hoists the blame for these "boys will be girls" times in which we live? All a bunch of no-fun, mule-bashers, are they? All about liberty with no social responsibility or connectedness? Environmental concerns? Issues beyond sender? Wow, if Id known they were all such a horrible bunch, I never would have bought in. Feminist con, indeed. Or maybe weve just traveled in different circles, a fact for which Im eternally grateful (neither she nor the "feminists" she describes sound like much fun).
By the way, my wifes 14 years older than I am. You want to tell her about how "women have always had a tendency to be drawn to men significantly older than themselves, of course"?
Brian Drier, Manhattan