<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Skeptical of New School</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nypress.com/skeptical-of-new-school/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nypress.com/skeptical-of-new-school/</link>
	<description>New York&#039;s essential guide to culture, arts, politics, news and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 11:49:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Kwok</title>
		<link>http://nypress.com/skeptical-of-new-school/#comment-550</link>
		<dc:creator>John Kwok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 07:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://westsidespirit.com/?p=3458#comment-550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jeremy,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obviously your reading comprehension is poor. Where have I said that I am against writing? What I have said, however, is that those who wish to write well should also have a firm grasp of the subject in question. As for Columbia University&#039;s School of Journalism, you have missed my point - as well as those echoed by others like noted science writer Carl Zimmer - that quality journalism, especially in the sciences and environmental issues, is suffering from a precipitous decline (which you can read about in Chris Mooney and Sheril Kirshenbaum&#039;s &quot;Unscientific America: How Scientific Illiteracy Threatens Our Future&quot;). A McCourt High School will have substantially less resources than high schools like Stuyvesant, Bronx Science, Townsend Harris, Brooklyn Tech, Beacon, or Hunter College High because of both its relatively small size and its reliance on antiquated facilities in the Brandeis High School building. It makes ample sense to conclude that such a school will not offer as rewarding an educational experience to its students as those I have just cited (For example, back in 1996, I discovered, much to my amazement, that Stuyvesant High School had superior photography facilities than what I had seen at a prominent undergraduate fine art photography program at the University of Arizona, which I had thought did have state-of-the-art studio and darkroom facilities.).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremy,</p>
<p>Obviously your reading comprehension is poor. Where have I said that I am against writing? What I have said, however, is that those who wish to write well should also have a firm grasp of the subject in question. As for Columbia University&#39;s School of Journalism, you have missed my point &#8211; as well as those echoed by others like noted science writer Carl Zimmer &#8211; that quality journalism, especially in the sciences and environmental issues, is suffering from a precipitous decline (which you can read about in Chris Mooney and Sheril Kirshenbaum&#39;s &#8220;Unscientific America: How Scientific Illiteracy Threatens Our Future&#8221;). A McCourt High School will have substantially less resources than high schools like Stuyvesant, Bronx Science, Townsend Harris, Brooklyn Tech, Beacon, or Hunter College High because of both its relatively small size and its reliance on antiquated facilities in the Brandeis High School building. It makes ample sense to conclude that such a school will not offer as rewarding an educational experience to its students as those I have just cited (For example, back in 1996, I discovered, much to my amazement, that Stuyvesant High School had superior photography facilities than what I had seen at a prominent undergraduate fine art photography program at the University of Arizona, which I had thought did have state-of-the-art studio and darkroom facilities.).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Kwok</title>
		<link>http://nypress.com/skeptical-of-new-school/#comment-549</link>
		<dc:creator>John Kwok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 03:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://westsidespirit.com/?p=3458#comment-549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jeremy,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obviously your reading comprehension is poor. Where have I said that I am against writing? What I have said, however, is that those who wish to write well should also have a firm grasp of the subject in question. As for Columbia University&#039;s School of Journalism, you have missed my point - as well as those echoed by others like noted science writer Carl Zimmer - that quality journalism, especially in the sciences and environmental issues, is suffering from a precipitous decline (which you can read about in Chris Mooney and Sheril Kirshenbaum&#039;s &quot;Unscientific America: How Scientific Illiteracy Threatens Our Future&quot;). A McCourt High School will have substantially less resources than high schools like Stuyvesant, Bronx Science, Townsend Harris, Brooklyn Tech, Beacon, or Hunter College High because of both its relatively small size and its reliance on antiquated facilities in the Brandeis High School building. It makes ample sense to conclude that such a school will not offer as rewarding an educational experience to its students as those I have just cited (For example, back in 1996, I discovered, much to my amazement, that Stuyvesant High School had superior photography facilities than what I had seen at a prominent undergraduate fine art photography program at the University of Arizona, which I had thought did have state-of-the-art studio and darkroom facilities.).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremy,</p>
<p>Obviously your reading comprehension is poor. Where have I said that I am against writing? What I have said, however, is that those who wish to write well should also have a firm grasp of the subject in question. As for Columbia University&#39;s School of Journalism, you have missed my point &#8211; as well as those echoed by others like noted science writer Carl Zimmer &#8211; that quality journalism, especially in the sciences and environmental issues, is suffering from a precipitous decline (which you can read about in Chris Mooney and Sheril Kirshenbaum&#39;s &#8220;Unscientific America: How Scientific Illiteracy Threatens Our Future&#8221;). A McCourt High School will have substantially less resources than high schools like Stuyvesant, Bronx Science, Townsend Harris, Brooklyn Tech, Beacon, or Hunter College High because of both its relatively small size and its reliance on antiquated facilities in the Brandeis High School building. It makes ample sense to conclude that such a school will not offer as rewarding an educational experience to its students as those I have just cited (For example, back in 1996, I discovered, much to my amazement, that Stuyvesant High School had superior photography facilities than what I had seen at a prominent undergraduate fine art photography program at the University of Arizona, which I had thought did have state-of-the-art studio and darkroom facilities.).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://nypress.com/skeptical-of-new-school/#comment-548</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 21:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://westsidespirit.com/?p=3458#comment-548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At the risk of encouraging your Quixotic anti-writing mission here, I&#039;ll just remind you that the fact that the best university in New York *has* a journalism school and considers it an important discipline is a greater counterpoint to your argument than you seem to understand.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the risk of encouraging your Quixotic anti-writing mission here, I&#39;ll just remind you that the fact that the best university in New York *has* a journalism school and considers it an important discipline is a greater counterpoint to your argument than you seem to understand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Kwok</title>
		<link>http://nypress.com/skeptical-of-new-school/#comment-547</link>
		<dc:creator>John Kwok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 19:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://westsidespirit.com/?p=3458#comment-547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Columbia University&#039;s suspension of its Environmental Journalism program is yet another dismal sign as to why a new Frank McCourt High School devoted to writing, journalism and literature is a bad idea. You can read it here:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ow.ly/vhIg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://ow.ly/vhIg&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Columbia University&#39;s suspension of its Environmental Journalism program is yet another dismal sign as to why a new Frank McCourt High School devoted to writing, journalism and literature is a bad idea. You can read it here:</p>
<p><a href="http://ow.ly/vhIg" rel="nofollow">http://ow.ly/vhIg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Kwok</title>
		<link>http://nypress.com/skeptical-of-new-school/#comment-546</link>
		<dc:creator>John Kwok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 14:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://westsidespirit.com/?p=3458#comment-546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Depends on which fields you are referring to, Jeremy. The New York Times&#039;s Michael Kimmelman specializes in reportage on the arts. Noted science writer Carl Zimmer has earned his reputation for his excellent reporting on the sciences, especially evolutionary biology. New York Times science editor Cornelia Dean made her mark by writing about beachfront erosion and human activity along rapidly eroding beaches, but has also written eloquently on general issues pertaining to evolution, especially with regards to the relationship between science and religion.  Her New York Times colleague Andrew Revkin is well known for his excellent reportage on climate change issues. There are many other journalists who specialize, and those who do tend to be among the best in their particular fields.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The only eight grader I am aware of  who wrote compulsively (at least that&#039;s what I&#039;m told) was Matt Ruff (incidentally a fellow alumnus of publisher Tom Allon&#039;s alma mater, Cornell University), who wrote unpublished science fiction novels at Stuyvesant High School, even as a student of McCourt&#039;s. However, he didn&#039;t really &quot;emerge&quot; as a writer until he studied with Cornell University English and writing professor Alison Lurie, which led to his first novel, &quot;Fool on the Hill&quot;, published a year after he had graduated from Cornell University and still regarded as a cult classic by his fellow Cornell alumni and by many fantasy and science fiction fans. I&#039;ve been acquainted with Ruff&#039;s work since 1990 and regard him, along with Gary Shteyngart (who did not study with McCourt to the best of my knowledge), as the two most notable literary alumni of Stuyvesant High School since 1970.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And then there is the issue as to whether such an 8th grader would receive a first-class education at the McCourt High School or rather, instead, at schools like Stuyvesant High School and Townshend Harris High School. I would say the latter, and in Stuyvesant&#039;s case, it is because of excellent facilities not only in the sciences, mathematics and technology, but also, for example, in English (which ironically is regarded now as the school&#039;s best department) and photography (when I visited it for the first time back in 1996, I was stunned to see that Stuyvesant&#039;s photography facilities were substantially better than that of one of the country&#039;s best college programs in fine art photography at the University of Arizona). In Townshend Harris High School&#039;s case, it is based on the campus of Queens College of CUNY, and has access to much - if not all - of the college&#039;s own resources.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;While naming the McCourt High School for Frank McCourt is a noble gesture, I strongly doubt that it will succeed in its objective of being a premier high school devoted to writing, journalism and literature.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Respectfully yours,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;John Kwok]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Depends on which fields you are referring to, Jeremy. The New York Times&#39;s Michael Kimmelman specializes in reportage on the arts. Noted science writer Carl Zimmer has earned his reputation for his excellent reporting on the sciences, especially evolutionary biology. New York Times science editor Cornelia Dean made her mark by writing about beachfront erosion and human activity along rapidly eroding beaches, but has also written eloquently on general issues pertaining to evolution, especially with regards to the relationship between science and religion.  Her New York Times colleague Andrew Revkin is well known for his excellent reportage on climate change issues. There are many other journalists who specialize, and those who do tend to be among the best in their particular fields.</p>
<p>The only eight grader I am aware of  who wrote compulsively (at least that&#39;s what I&#39;m told) was Matt Ruff (incidentally a fellow alumnus of publisher Tom Allon&#39;s alma mater, Cornell University), who wrote unpublished science fiction novels at Stuyvesant High School, even as a student of McCourt&#39;s. However, he didn&#39;t really &#8220;emerge&#8221; as a writer until he studied with Cornell University English and writing professor Alison Lurie, which led to his first novel, &#8220;Fool on the Hill&#8221;, published a year after he had graduated from Cornell University and still regarded as a cult classic by his fellow Cornell alumni and by many fantasy and science fiction fans. I&#39;ve been acquainted with Ruff&#39;s work since 1990 and regard him, along with Gary Shteyngart (who did not study with McCourt to the best of my knowledge), as the two most notable literary alumni of Stuyvesant High School since 1970.</p>
<p>And then there is the issue as to whether such an 8th grader would receive a first-class education at the McCourt High School or rather, instead, at schools like Stuyvesant High School and Townshend Harris High School. I would say the latter, and in Stuyvesant&#39;s case, it is because of excellent facilities not only in the sciences, mathematics and technology, but also, for example, in English (which ironically is regarded now as the school&#39;s best department) and photography (when I visited it for the first time back in 1996, I was stunned to see that Stuyvesant&#39;s photography facilities were substantially better than that of one of the country&#39;s best college programs in fine art photography at the University of Arizona). In Townshend Harris High School&#39;s case, it is based on the campus of Queens College of CUNY, and has access to much &#8211; if not all &#8211; of the college&#39;s own resources.</p>
<p>While naming the McCourt High School for Frank McCourt is a noble gesture, I strongly doubt that it will succeed in its objective of being a premier high school devoted to writing, journalism and literature.</p>
<p>Respectfully yours,</p>
<p>John Kwok</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://nypress.com/skeptical-of-new-school/#comment-545</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 22:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://westsidespirit.com/?p=3458#comment-545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quite clearly, journalism and other writing are disciplines that require just as much knowledge and expertise as fine art, history or science.  The application of each of these is its own skill.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the real world, the best journalists are fundamentally utility players, with a broad portfolio of knowledge.  In fact, outlets like the New York Times rotate reporters in and out of Iraq not necessarily on the basis of deep knowledge of the area, but rather general reporting skill and desire.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Put simply, if an 8th-grader wants to write, let him write.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite clearly, journalism and other writing are disciplines that require just as much knowledge and expertise as fine art, history or science.  The application of each of these is its own skill.</p>
<p>In the real world, the best journalists are fundamentally utility players, with a broad portfolio of knowledge.  In fact, outlets like the New York Times rotate reporters in and out of Iraq not necessarily on the basis of deep knowledge of the area, but rather general reporting skill and desire.</p>
<p>Put simply, if an 8th-grader wants to write, let him write.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
