Mugger: Baracklash
Right now, in February, its difficult to envision John McCain defeating Barack Obama for the presidency this coming fall. (This is assuming, of course, that the Clinton machine will ultimately be unsuccessful in winning the nomination for Hillary, a bet I wouldnt yet take.) An Obama victory is not a desirable outcome in my opiniona crippling re-jiggering of the tax code, frightening foreign policy debacles and an expansion of entitlements spring to mindbut the pandemonium the middle-aged senator has stirred up across the country really is something to behold. One assumes the media backlash isnt too far in the distance, since even MSNBCs excitable and fickle Chris Matthews cant go from now until November exclaiming, as he did on Feb. 12, that when the Illinois legislator speaks before a crowd a thrill [goes] up my leg.
Ive experienced no such emotion, but from a cultural rather than political point of view, its all pretty fascinating. Last week, the day before the Maryland primary, two young friends23 and 24took the afternoon off for the privilege of seeing Obama at the 1st Mariner Arena in downtown Baltimore, waiting two-and-a-half hours for the candidate to arrive. The next day they described his 30-minute speech as an event that was almost as exhilarating, to put this in perspective, as seeing an impromptu Radiohead show at a local club. John, the younger of the pair, even brought along his wife and one-year-old daughter to the rally, despite the frigid weather and endless loop of Stevie Wonder songs and exhortations from hack city council members in preparation for the lead act.
Watching Obamas performance the next day, I was reminded once again that the pundits and Boomers are all wet when they compare him to the Kennedy brothers more than 40 years ago. Never mind that the slain president in the spring of 1960 wasnt JFK yet, and in any case this mistaken analogy simply diminishes Obamas stage appeal. When he said in Baltimore and other tour spots that hes a skinny but wiry and tough guy whos waiting for the GOP to bring it onand then for just three seconds shadow boxed for the crowdit was a stunning bit. Hes a politician, sure; but hes also an entertainer, blending the cadences and cool appeal of a young Ali, Bob Dylan, Smokey Robinson, Bono, Marjoe, Martin Luther King Jr. and pre-U.S. David Beckham in one complete package.
Like a lot of skeptical observers, I dont have a clue whats behind his airy rhetoric and increasingly confident message of change. But when he commanded the audience to respect McCain as an American hero who should be honored for his half century of servicemixing the sweet and sour so effortlessly that he made Bill Clinton look like an amateur with all the charisma and go-for-the-jugular patter of Chris Doddits clear this guys an original. In the event Obama doesnt win the presidency, he could make a bundle as a talk- show host or movie star.
My friends Pete and John tried, almost apologetically, to explain Obamas appeal to young voters. You have to understand, Pete, a staunch Democrat whos wired into the political minutiae of the day, for people our age this is entirely new. Weve never had a candidate to support whos so inspiring. But who has? As a teenager, Gene McCarthy made the sale to me, but he wasnt in the same league as Obama (nor did he aspire to that celebrity status).
In the spring of 76, Jerry Brown, the 38-year-old first-term governor of California made a late run against the oily Jimmy Carter, and I saw him speak twice in Maryland, along with his entourage of Linda Ronstadt, Ronnie Blakely and Keith Carradine. The very notion that someone under 40 had the audacity to run for president was intoxicating, yet his run was a soon-forgotten flash, and though his visionary (and sometimes goofy) ideas were memorable, his stage presence was not. Conservative commentators, just coming to grips with the fact that Obamas the likely nominee, have begun digging beyond what The Wall Street Journals Daniel Henninger calls the insanely eloquent quality of the phenoms Yes, we can! rhetoric. Last week, addressing not only the adoring masses of Democrats but grudgingly admiring Republicans, Henninger wrote: Unhinge yourself from the mesmerizing voice. What one hears is a message that is largely negative, illustrated with anecdotes of unremitting bleakness. Heavy with class warfare [his speeches] could have been delivered in 1968, or even 1928.
Such an opinion is not unexpected and makes sense to someone like me. Whats far more interesting, however, is the divide between liberals who certainly agree that George Bushs tenure was a disaster but snipe at each other about the Democratic candidates. James Wolcott, for example, vented on his Feb. 6 Vanity Fair blog that he voted for Clinton in the New York primary because hes not a narcissist and doesnt expect politicians to nourish him with transcendence and self-certification. Then the shiv comes out: I dont accept being lectured or morally browbeaten into voting for one candidate over another in order to prove my virtuous intent and appease Kurt Andersens peculiar, posturing racial anxieties. A few days later, Wolcott strains credulityat least by my reckoningthat Obama would be a weaker opponent for McCain because hed be unable to counter the Republican bag of dirty tricks as well as Hillary could.
At The New Republic, graybeard Leon Wieseltier counters the Obama swoon expressed by younger journalists by saying, My problem is that Obamas declarations in matters of foreign policy and national security have a certain homeopathic quality. He seems averse to the hurtful, expensive, traditional, unedifying stuff.
The Times Paul Krugman is of another species altogether, bitching about the venom aimed at Clinton by Obama supporters. He worries, ostensibly, that Democrats in this primary race are turning into Democrats. Frankly, I think Krugman fears an Obama presidency for the simple reason that after seven years of excoriating Bush and his cronies, hed be forced to dial down the vitriol in his op-ed columns. He might, perish the thought, be forced to write about economics.
As someone who doesnt care for Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity or any number of nutty preachers who berate McCain for not being conservative enoughas opposed to Obama and ClintonI find it refreshing that the Democratic intelligentsia is engaging in similar battle over purity. The uglier the better.