Comments on: Knight to Remember http://nypress.com/knight-to-remember/ New York's essential guide to culture, arts, politics, news and more Mon, 04 Mar 2013 11:49:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: ZAP_ZAP http://nypress.com/knight-to-remember/#comment-26075 ZAP_ZAP Tue, 27 Nov 2012 07:28:00 +0000 #comment-26075 When a critic bashes a film’s take on morality without providing a moral framework, you shouldn’t think it’s “well thought out.”

]]> By: yaa http://nypress.com/knight-to-remember/#comment-15843 yaa Sat, 23 Jun 2012 06:15:00 +0000 #comment-15843 no, not really, his criticisms in this review are actually mostly entirely irrelevant to the movie itself

]]> By: Kangaroo Be Stoned http://nypress.com/knight-to-remember/#comment-15644 Kangaroo Be Stoned Tue, 19 Jun 2012 23:05:00 +0000 #comment-15644 So, he’s an ass for disagreeing with the consensus? Why? His reasoning about how poor this film is (I feel the same) is well thought out.

]]> By: yaa http://nypress.com/knight-to-remember/#comment-15457 yaa Mon, 18 Jun 2012 00:21:00 +0000 #comment-15457 I disagree with what was said about the characters’ dark morality. I think Nolan did well with creating multi-dimensional characters that responded appropriately to these “post 9/11″ terrorist acts.

As for the review, it shames the audience more than the movie itself, as if liking this genuinely good film is something to be made fun of. It’s okay to appreciate a film if it’s good (which this was.) Taking an opposite stance on popular opinion doesn’t make you look smarter – just makes you look like an ass.

]]>