"IF SOMETHING HAPPENS, you have nowhere to complain,” says Anna, a 38-year-old West-African nanny. “It makes me worried.”
For most of her seven-year career as a nanny, Anna has been fortunate to work for two families that have paid her a decent wage for roughly nine hours of work a day. Her duties usually include taking the children for a stroll or to play dates, cooking dinner in the evening and cleaning.
But even with good employers, Anna (in all cases, names of the nannies have been changed to protect their identity) has still been denied something as basic as proper time off. The first family that hired her, she explains, never provided paid sick days. Luckily for her, they weren’t needed. In fact, she was unaware that such perks were common until she interviewed for a position with a woman—a lawyer—who promised one a month. “There’s no right to complain,” she says.
While many domestic workers talk lovingly of the families that hired them, others grumble on playgrounds around the city about simple annoyances—like being barred from eating inside the boss’ home, or having to take the children outdoors every day. Still other grievances are more serious:The family goes on vacation and refuses to pay the nanny for time away, or the nannies are denied paid sick days. For people on a tight budget, this lost work adds up and can force them to look for consistent employment elsewhere.
Domestic workers are guaranteed the federal minimum wage, but there are no guide lines for working conditions and rights, and few avenues to complain. Given that most of the metropolitan area’s 200,000 domestic workers are undocumented immigrants, and with job opportunities becoming scarcer, few are willing to voice an objection. A coalition of domestic workers, labor unions and human rights organizations await the State Legislature to finally change the law this session.
Domestic Workers United, a group started in 2000, has been lobbying Albany for a bill to provide basic labor rights to these employees. Since the bill’s first introduction in 2004, the legislation got little traction. But last year’s Democratic takeover of the State Senate brightened prospects when Staten Island State Sen. Diane Savino, a former labor leader, became the main sponsor. Nevertheless, the coup this past June and month-long stalemate that ensued have shelved progress until the next session this September, at the earliest.
Patricia, a Caribbean immigrant who has been a nanny for just more than a decade, says she has been a victim of physical and verbal abuse, and was denied overtime pay and much-needed time off. And because every major labor law fails to cover domestic workers or splits hairs between those who live inside and outside the family’s home, it is near impossible to recoup money. That’s one reason she became involved with Domestic Workers United.
She sees great value in her job. “We make other work possible,” she says proudly, explaining that if she is late to work, so is her boss. She is currently unemployed and has worked for families in New Jersey and the Upper West Side.
Depending on which bill makes it to the governor’s desk—the meatier Senate version, the basic legislation proposed by the Assembly or a combination of the two—the law aims to drastically change working conditions for a majority of nannies in the city and surrounding suburbs.The state’s labor department and the attorney general would have enforcement power over these new laws, and could prosecute employers who stiff their nanny.
The bill legally defines a domestic worker as a person of legal age who cares for a child or elderly person in someone’s home, so as to not inadvertently cover babysitters and minors. Rights outlined in the legislation will likely include a guarantee of at least one day off a week, sick days, a yearly weeklong vacation, paid holidays and time and a half for overtime.
“We’re not asking for more than any other worker,” Patricia explains.
Actually, they are not asking for anything more than the rights already given to the small percentage of legally documented nannies who are placed through agencies (a Domestic Workers United study found that only 16 percent of those surveyed were placed through an agency). The New York Nanny Center, Inc., for example, screens both the families and the nannies and draws up an agreement between the two before the match is made.This agreement spells out the number of days the nanny will work with a maximum of five days a week, responsibilities, two weeks paid vacation and major holidays, plus any other conditions the nanny and family want to make.
“I think that in most licensed agencies, there is an expectation that there is a fair job description for the nanny,” said Carol Solomon, director of the New York Nanny Center, Inc. “Agencies are trying to establish what’s fair for everybody so nobody is taken advantage of in these situations.”
The change would be a significant one for non-agency nannies. Domestic Workers United released a survey that showed that the majority of nannies interviewed don’t get overtime pay, health insurance or contracts that outline their responsibilities.The survey is one of the few glimpses legislators in Albany have into this profession, because the government provides so few statistics.
“The workforce isn’t registered anywhere,” said Ai-Jen Poo, lead organizer for Domestic Workers United. “All this invisible labor…is not accounted for and makes it difficult for us to advocate for protection because it’s not even seen.”
Domestic Workers United, the lead group lobbying for the law, also plans to launch an education campaign with help from the state’s justice department.
“We have to do creative outreach.We have to work with churches and synagogues,” Poo said. “The industry is very decentralized.”
Perhaps it is unfathomable for famously liberal Manhattanites to deny supporting paid time off and overtime for their nannies. There are many that do so already.While the new law would hit families in the wallet at a time when they may be evaluating if they can afford such help at all, the benefit would be clear rules on paying and treating nannies, decreasing reliance on parent blogs, forums and neighbors for second-hand, unverifiable advice. Online communities are rife with questions about paying a nanny on the books, when to give raises and compensating nannies who accompany the family on a vacation.
“There are people—Mr. and Mrs. Smith who hire a housekeeper and nanny—who feel the work they do is so vital to their family and that they deserve basic protection under the law,” Poo said. “People won’t have to go to friends or chat rooms to find out what is fair.”