Cage Match: Slow It Down

Written by Matt Taibbi on . Posted in Breaking News, Posts.


"The enemy we’re
fighting is different than the one we’d war gamed against."

–General
William Wallace

There was a lot of talk about Gen. Wallace’s little blunder, but it seemed to
me that everyone missed the real significance of it. Looking just below the
surface, you could see revealed in the general’s comment a crucial, damning
truth about the war. And that is this: The real reason the Bush administration
did not expect the Iraqis to fight is that its entire experience with opposition
has been with the American civilian.

There’s
almost nothing you can’t get away with doing to an American. Take away
his health insurance and he’s likely to fall to his knees in gratitude.
You can tell him to his face that you’re pulling funding for his kids’
schools in order to bail out some millionaire stockbroker in Connecticut who
overbet the peso–and he not only won’t get mad, he’ll swell up
with pride and burst out singing the "Star-Spangled Banner." You can
even steal his pension and gamble it away in Vegas, and the most he’ll
do is sulk a little.

In those
rare cases when an American gets mad, what he usually does is wait four years
to vote for an identical candidate. Push him a little farther over the edge,
and he may flirt with a hopeless third-party politician or write a sarcastic
letter to the New York Times. And when he becomes disconsolate, when
he finally decides to take to the streets, look out–because now he’s
a real threat–standing in some park or other publicly sanctioned place,
and chanting goofy slogans while carrying a poster of George Bush with a crayon-drawn
forked tail.

The White
House expected the Iraqis to line up like redcoats with their muskets drawn
in single-rank formation because that’s what we do. Whatever they
tell us the permissible means of protest is, that’s what we do. If the
permit for the demonstration is at an abandoned drive-in fifty miles from the
nearest town, we show up there, brows furrowed and banners waving, in huge numbers.
While the generals point at high-tech maps on all the major networks, we sit
there babbling into the crackly dissenter line on C-SPAN at two in the morning.
There would probably still be kings playing croquet on the grounds of Versailles
today if the tactics of the French revolution had been like this–better
heed us peasants, messieurs, or we’ll send twice the usual amount
of mail to our congressmen.

We’re
so accustomed to following the "rules" of political engagement that
when someone like Michael Moore breaches decorum for thirty seconds to sabotage
his own Oscar acceptance, enormous numbers of us actually consider this a real
act of brave defiance, and not the quixotic, colossally insufficient gesture
it was.

The whole
point of opposition is to make sure that the people who are making decisions
know that there will be consequences if they go too far in ignoring the public,
or at least a plurality of it. And I think it has to be said that for people
like Bush and Rumsfeld, large marches of malcontents in New York and Washington
are not a consequence. They’re an amusing bonus.

This little
adventure in Iraq wouldn’t even be fun for people like Bush and
Rumsfeld unless they could take a break from watching the missile-cam footage
from time to time to look out the window and see 500,000 dirty hippies singing
"Kumbaya" under the Washington monument. What’s life without
a little comic relief?

I realize
that "500,000 dirty hippies" is an unfair characterization. But that’s
the whole point. That’s all it takes to dismiss 500,000 protesters–a
characterization. The big three, CNN and FOX have succeeded in making every
antiwar protest look like a gathering of bitter losers with too much time on
their hands, and I would be shocked if it weren’t true that every time
an earnest, polysyllabic protester made his way onto the air, Bush didn’t
gain 10,000 votes for the next election.

People like
me are part of the problem, too, which is why I’m even on the subject.
I could make myself feel better about things by writing glibly about this or
that government lie, but that’s really what it accomplishes–making
me feel better.

In fact,
the whole business of keeping track of media deceptions has become an unusually
ridiculous exercise, and one would need a thousand pages a week to even begin
to do a decent job of it.

You have
to wonder after a while whether this is a good use of my or anyone else’s
time, racing to keep track of the unceasing string of sensational headlines
that turn out ten minutes later to be idiotic fabrications: the Basra uprising
that wasn’t, the deployed Scud missile that wasn’t, the seizure of
Basra that wasn’t, the uncovered secret chemical weapons factory that was
damning proof of the existence of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction–except
that it wasn’t–the missiles that landed in Turkey and Iran that weren’t
ours until they were, the civilians we didn’t bomb at two different marketplaces
in Baghdad, the mass surrenders that weren’t, and so on.

Then there’s
our benevolent solution to the humanitarian aid problem in Umm-Qasr: providing
free water to Iraqis with tanker trucks, who would then be allowed to resell
it to the thirsty for a "reasonable fee."

After a
while, it’s simply not dignified to freak out over each of these things
individually. The dignified thing to do is to recognize once and for all the
essential nature of what we’re up against, and then fight it. Don’t
write petitions or make appeals, don’t sing songs, don’t wait for
someone up there to change their "minds." Just fight it. And make
it hurt.

Wall Street
supports this war. How do you think it would react if all 30 percent of the
country that opposes the war decided one day to dump all of its stock? A self-defeating
gesture, to be sure, but we didn’t get to drink the British tea, either.
CNN and FOX are making a killing waving a flag for the Pentagon. Why not start
boycotting their advertisers one at a time until they pull their spots? Does
Dell really want that "Dude, you’re getting a Dell" kid to be
turned into a symbol of the war machine on college campuses?

Hell, forget
about boycotting just Dell. Boycott everything. If even this minority
of the population could go a month without over-consuming, it would give corporate
America an aneurysm. Just one month of no new cars, no new hoop shoes, no Atlantic
records, no Kellogg’s Fruit Harvest, no nothing but the bare minimum.

For years,
corporate America and the media have tried to convince us that buying things
is a political act, a way of expressing our individuality (Fruitopia instead
of flower power, Nikes sold to the tune of "Revolution," peace signs
on the walls of Starbucks). Well, let’s call their bluff. Let’s non-participate.
Let’s go on consumer strike. Pull a slowdown. We don’t have a lot
of choices when it comes to voting for politicians, but when it comes to buying,
where our existence is actually necessary, we have a thousand choices a day.
It might be the only method we have of making the decision-making class pay
attention to our concerns.

Hell, let’s
try something, anyway. Because what we’re doing now is just what they expected–nothing.

 

Send
comments to
taibbi@nypress.com

..