Home » Articles » Film » Films Reviews »  Pride & Precious
Wednesday, November 4,2009

Pride & Precious

You can thank media titans Oprah Winfrey and Tyler Perry for much of the hype surrounding Lee Daniels’ film Precious. ARMOND WHITE calls it the ‘Con Job of the Year.’

By Armond White
. . . . . . .
Gabourey Sidibe (left) and Mo'Nique in 'Precious'
SHAME ON TYLER PERRY and Oprah Winfrey for signing on as air-quote executive producers of Precious. After this post-hip-hop freak show wowed Sundance last January, it now slouches toward Oscar ratification thanks to its powerful friends.Winfrey and Perry had no hand in the actual production of Precious, yet the movie must have touched some sore spot in their demagogue psyches. They’ve piggybacked their reps as black success stories hoping to camouflage Precious’ con job—even though it’s more scandalous than their own upliftment trade. Perry and Winfrey naively treat Precious’ exhibition of ghetto tragedy and female disempowerment as if it were raw truth. It helps contrast and highlight their achievements as black American paradigms—self-respect be damned.

Let’s scrutinize their endorsement: Precious isn’t simply a strivers’ message movie; Perry and Winfrey recognize its propaganda value. The story of an overweight black teenage girl who is repeatedly raped and impregnated by her father, molested and beaten by her mother comes from a 1990s identity-politics novel by a poet named Sapphire. It piles on self pity and recrimination consistent with the air-quotes’ own oft-recounted backstories. Promoting this movie isn’t just a way for Perry and Winfrey to aggrandize themselves, it helps convert their private agendas into heavily hyped social preoccupation.

But Perry and Winfrey aren’t all that keep Precious from sinking into the ghetto of oblivion like such dull, bourgie, black-themed movies as The Great Debaters or The Pursuit of Happyness. That’s because the film’s writer-director Lee Daniels works the salacious side of the black strivers’ street. Daniels knows how to turn a racist trick. As producer of Monster’s Ball, Daniels symbolized Halle Berry’s ravishment as integration; Kevin Bacon titillated pedophilia in Daniels’ The Woodsman and Daniels’ directorial debut, Shadowboxing, hinted at interracial incest between stepmother and son Helen Mirren and Cuba Gooding Jr.

Winfrey, Perry and Daniels make an unholy triumvirate.They come together at some intersection of race exploitation and opportunism. These two media titans—plus one shrewd pathology pimp—use Precious to rework Booker T. Washington’s early 20th-century manifesto Up From Slavery into extreme drama for the new millennium: Up From Incest, Child Abuse,Teenage Pregnancy, Poverty and AIDS. Regardless of its narrative details about class and gender, Precious is an orgy of prurience. All the terrible, depressing (not uplifting) things that happen to 16year-old Precious recall that memorable All About Eve line, “Everything but the bloodhounds nipping at her rear-end.”

It starts with the opening scene of Precious’ Cinderella fantasy. Tarted up in a boa and gown, walking a red carpet light years away from her tenement reality, Precious (Gabourey Sidibe) sighs, “I wish I had a light-skinned boyfriend with nice hair.” Her ideal smacks of selfhatred—the colorism issue that Daniels exacerbates without exploring. He casts light-skinned actors as kind (schoolteacher Paula Patton, social worker Mariah Carey, nurse Lenny Kravitz and an actual Down syndrome child as Precious’ first-born) and dark-skinned actors as terrors. Sidibe herself is presented as an animal-like stereotype—she’s so obese her face seems bloated into a permanent pout.This is not the breakthrough Todd Solondz achieved in Palindromes where plus-size black actress Sharon Wilkins artfully represented the immensity of an outcast’s misunderstood humanity. Instead, Sidibe’s fancy-dressed daydream looks laughable; poorly photographed, its primary effect is pathetic.

Daniels employs the same questionable pathos as the family banquet scene at the start of Denzel Washington’s also condescending Antwone Fisher. This cheap ploy of tortured daydreaming uses black American deprivation for sentimentality. It sells materialist fantasy as a universal motivation—no wonder Perry and Winfrey like it. Precious embodies an unenlightening canard.That fantasy opening—depicting the girl’s Obama-like ascension—tantalizes thoughts of advancement and triumph. It ought to be satirical to undercut the norms she aspires to just as Palindromes’ misfit teens subverted MTV’s ideas of youth.

Perry and Winfrey may think Precious is serious, but Daniels is hoisting his freak flag. He gets off on degradation. Flashbacks to Precious’ rape contain a curious montage of grease, sweat, bacon and Vaseline. Later, he intercuts a shot of pig’s feet cooking on a stove with Precious being humped while her mother watches from a corner. Another misjudged scene recreates De Sica’s B&W Two Women—a half-camp trashing of motherhood that compounds the problem of cultural alienation. So does the film’s Ebonics credit sequence and the scene of Precious rotating amidst a bombardment of success icons—Martina Arroyo, MLK, Shirley Chisholm—to which she either relates or is ignorant.This incoherence should not pass for sociology.

Not since The Birth of a Nation has a mainstream movie demeaned the idea of black American life as much as Precious. Full of brazenly racist clichés (Precious steals and eats an entire bucket of fried chicken), it is a sociological horror show. Offering racist hysteria masquerading as social sensitivity, it’s been acclaimed on the international festival circuit that usually disdains movies about black Americans as somehow inartistic and unworthy.

The hype for Precious indicates a culture-wide willingness to accept particular ethnic stereotypes as a way of maintaining status quo film values. Excellent recent films with black themes—Next Day Air, Cadillac Records, Meet Dave, Norbit, Little Man, Akeelah and the Bee, First Sunday, The Ladykillers, Marci X, Palindromes, Mr. 3000, even back to the great Beloved (also produced by Oprah)—have been ignored by the mainstream media and serious film culture while this carnival of black degradation gets celebrated. It’s a strange combination of liberal guilt and condescension.

Birth of a Nation glorified the rise of the Ku Klux Klan as a panicky subculture’s solution to social change. Precious hyperbolizes the class misery of our nation’s left-behinds—not the post- Rapture reprobates of Christianity’s last-days theories, but the Obama-era unreachables—including Precious’ Benetton-esque assortment of remedial school classmates. One explanation is that Precious permits a cultural version of that 1960s political controversy “benign neglect”—its agreed-upon selection of the most pathetic racial images and social catastrophes helps to normalize the circumstances of poverty and abandon that will never change or be resolved.You can think: Precious is just how those people are (although Cops and the Jerry Springer and Maury Povich shows offer enough evidence that white folks live low, too).

Precious’ plot is so outrageous (although the New York Times Magazine touts it as “The Audacity of Precious,” a telling link to Obama’s memoir The Audacity of Hope) that its acclaim suggests an aftershock of all that Hurricane Katrina weeping and lamentation about America’s Others. This movie finally puts the deprivations of Katrina on the big screen—not as smug, political fingerpointing, nor the inconsequential way superliberals Brad Pitt and David Fincher shoehorned Katrina into Benjamin Button, but as sheer melodramatic terror. (Poor Precious endures the most brutal home life since Lillian Gish in the 1918 Broken Blossoms.)

Precious raises ghosts of ethnic fear and exoticism just like Birth of a Nation. Precious and her mother (Mo’Nique) share a Harlem hovel so stereotypical it could be a Klansman’s fantasy. It also suggests an outsider’s romantic view of the political wretchedness and despair associated with the blues. Critics willingly infer there’s black life essence in Precious’ anti-life tale. And the same high-dudgeon tsk-tsking of Hurricane Katrina commentators is also apparent in the movie’s praise. Pundits who bemoan the awful conditions that have not improved for America’s unfortunate are reminded that they are still on top.

This misreading of blues sensibility probably has something to do with the disconnect caused by hip-hop, where thuggishness and criminality romanticize black ghetto life. Director Daniels’ rotgut images of aggressive cruelty and low-life illiteracy aren’t far from gangster rap clichés.The spectacle warps how people perceive black American life— perhaps even replacing their instincts for compassion with fear and loathing.

Media hype helps pass this disdain down to the masses. Precious is meant to be enjoyed as a Lady Bountiful charity event. And look: Oprah,TV’s Lady Bountiful, joins the bandwagon. It continues her abusefetish and self-help nostrums (though the scene where Precious carries her baby past a “Spay and Neuter Your Pets” sign is sick).

Problem is, Perry,Winfrey and Daniels’ pityparty bait-and-switches our social priorities.

Personal pathology gets changed into a melodrama of celebrity-endorsed self-pity. The con artists behind Precious seize this Obama moment in which racial anxiety can be used to signify anything anybody can stretch it to mean. And Daniels needs this humorless condescension (Hollywood’s version of benign neglect) to obscure his lurid purposes.

Sadly, Mike Leigh’s emotionally exact and socially perceptive films (Secrets and Lies, All or Nothing, Happy Go Lucky) that answer contemporary miserablism with genuine social and spiritual insight have not penetrated Daniels,Winfrey, Perry’s consciousness—nor of the Oscarheads now championing Precious. They’ve also ignored Jonathan Demme’s moving treatment of the lingering personal and communal tragedy of slavery in Beloved. Both Leigh and Demme understand the spiritual challenges to despair and their richly detailed performances testify to that fact. Sidibe and Mo’Nique give two-note performances: dumb and innocent, crazy and evil. Monique’s do-rag doesn’t convey depths within herself, nor does Mariah Carey’s fright wig. Daniels’ cast lacks that uncanny mix of love and threat that makes Next Day Air so August Wilson- authentic.

Worse than Precious itself was the ordeal of watching it with an audience full of patronizing white folk at the New York Film Festival, then enduring its media hoodwink as a credible depiction of black American life. A scene such as the hippopotamus-like teenager climbing a K-2 incline of tenement stairs to present her newborn, incest-bred baby to her unhinged virago matriarch, might have been met howls of skeptical laughter at Harlem’s Magic Johnson theater. Black audiences would surely have seen the comedy in this ludicrous, overloaded situation, whereas too many white film habitués casually enjoy it for the sense of superiority—and relief—it allows them to feel. Some people like being conned.

For more, read Armond White's reviews of:


  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Posted at 11/20/2009 
 
…Haven’t seen it, but the character was a composite of actual incidents of individuals the author had contact with as some kind of social worker. And I personally have encountered numerous similar tragic life stories of teen girls in my work. Whatever the slant, presentation, twist or lighting of the film, the storyline has happened and does happen … So it has value from that perspective, whatever the director’s/producers’ agenda. The author needs to accept that, live with it, get over it and then deal with it appropriately by making a true difference in the lives of others and not a knee-jerk rhetorical article. “Norbit”?????? whateva…

 

Posted at 11/20/2009 
 
You truly cut through the media hype which is backlighted by the afterglow of the remnants of Perry and Winfrey's burning self-respect. Precious' life is not representative of Black life, rather it is an almost laughable caricature of white America's perception of life in the ghetto, replete with vaudvillian characters existing in improbably depressed oblivion so far removed from the media imposed impression of mainstream American life, that it can be safely and vicariously dissected, observed and then offhandedly discarded without ruffling liberal sensibilities.

 

Posted at 11/19/2009 
 
Thank you for this review! I am an African American woman and I am disgusted that this movie is being put out for consumption and promotion, and getting Oscar buzz at that! Of all of the stories to tell, to receive recognition, this is what Winfrey and Perry (who both have their own agendas) have chosen. This is not what people want.

 

Posted at 11/18/2009 
 
For all the people that think White is nuts/self-loathing/a contrarian for the sake of being one because he loathes this film I offer you the following paragraph from his SUPERB review of The Blind Side: "Bullock’s movie, about an upper-middle-class white Southern family who take in a homeless black kid, Michael Oher, and paves the path for his future in pro-sports, is so free of the guilt Precious arouses that it simultaneously raises the level of social imagination. Producing and starring in a script by director John Lee Hancock (The Rookie), Bullock trusts that the popular audience shares basic humane values rather than a taste for the squalid and bizarre behavior that defines Lee Daniels’ decadent specialty that has degraded recent cultural discourse." That paragraph ALONE not only ties both movies together beautifully but it also clarifies his viewpoints about precious. Instead of going for guilt (something A LOT of liberal filmmakers/moviegoers go/fall for), John Lee Hancock opts for a more subtle/less condescending way of driving home a similar point as what Lee Daniels attempted to do with Precious. It seems that movie audiences these days walk out of a movie without questioning WHY they felt the way they did while watching a certain movie. If I'm shocked at what I see and then feel uplifted at the end of the movie by glossing over essential elements or simplifying human emotions/interactions and going for fake emotion does that mean that what I saw was morally appropriate? REMEMBER: guilt (the corrupting element in Precious as well as Slumdog Millionare) IS NOT THE SAME as compassion. If we are a truly compassionate society compassion should be inherent within everyone of us and SHOULD NOT be hammered in by trash like Precious/Slumdog Millionaire.

 

Posted at 11/19/2009 
My English is bad but i felt compelled to answer Igbo's shallow comment. Just because you don't feel emotionally manipulated doesn't mean you're not emotionally manipulated. It's like saying that because many people live their everyday lives under the dictatorship regimes, these kind of governments are good and harmless for some countries. People live like that because they have no insight or consciousness about their social and political problems therefore they live in a bubble dream. You say you're saddened but don't give any analysis about your feeling. Now who is arrogant? Armond white who backs up his opinion with reasoning and references to some particular scenes of the movie or Igbo and people like him/her who are just referring to their feelings and assume that automatically answers everything.

 

Posted at 11/19/2009 
I'm saddened by what happens to the title character in "Precious," but I don't feel guilty about it. Guilt suggests a feeling of being responsible for what happened. One of the problems I have with Armond White's review is that he arrogantly assumes he knows how audiences react to the film. He doesn't. While the specific details of Precious' life might be unique, there are plenty of young women with similar stories. It is my understanding that the script was based on the writer's experience as a school teacher. I've taught in the public schools and have spoken to other teachers as well about their experiences. The lives of some of these young people are tragic. You do what you can for them, but you can't save them all.

 

Posted at 11/16/2009 
 
Armond White is not a critic, he's a contrarian. This review is just another example. This is not to say that he doesn't make a valid point or two. Everyone has a right to their opinion, but some of White's assertions about this film are so preposterous, I feel compelled to make mention of them. First of all, his comparison of "Precious" with D.W. Griffith's racist masterpiece "Birth of a Nation" is absurd. The absurdity of the comparison is even more pronounced given his accusation of "colorism" in the casting of the film. I'll discuss the merits of the argument in a moment. His assertion that all of the "good" people are light-skinned in "Precious" and all of the dark-skinned are bad, clearly does not apply to "Birth of a Nation." In Griffith's film, the most negative portrayal of an African American is Silas Lynch, the mulatto who tries to rape a white woman. Meanwhile, the most "favorable" portrayals were of the dark-skinned blacks that were loyal to the slaveowners, who were shown as kind and docile. White's comment about alledged colorism is overstated, but still worthy of discussion. It's true that the most sensitive people to Precious are lighter skinned compared to the ones that are really mean to her, but when it comes to the latter, all we're really talking about is her parents. Since Precious is dark-skinned, it is only logical that her parents are also dark-skinned. Now when it comes to Ms. Rain (the teacher) and Mrs. Weiss (the social worker), certainly darker skinned people could have been cast. But as someone who has actually been involved in casting a film (Armond White obviously has not), there are numerous considerations that go into the process. These include marquee value, talent and availability. All of these are much larger considerations to feature filmmakers than any attempts at colorism. For example, it is my understanding that Mariah Carey was not the director's first choice to play the social worker, but Helen Mirren. Who knows which other actresses (perhaps dark-skinned) were considered to play either Mrs. Weiss or Ms. Rain? But frankly, if say a darker-skinned actress like Gabrielle Union or even Marianne Jean-Baptiste (from your beloved "Secret & Lies") had played the teacher, would that made a difference in your review? I doubt it. What if a light-skinned actress had played the mother? I doubt that two. [As a side note, some people unfairly criticized "Secrets & Lies' because they thought Marianne Jean-Baptiste was too dark to play the daughter of a white woman.] For than likely, you would have found some other aspect of the character to fixate on? Besides, if colorism is such a big issue with you, how come there's no mention of colorism in your favorable review of "Tyler Perry's Why Did I Get Married?" In that film, the most vile and morally bankrupt characters in the film are all played by dark-skinned actors. At least in "Precious," we get a sense of why Mary is so mean to her daughter. In many ways, she's a much more tragic figure than Precious. On another note, your comment about the casting of newcomer Gabourey Sidibe in the title role reveals your own prejudices. It is simply cruel and demeaning on your part to dismiss her as simply an "animal-like stereotype." Venture into any major American city and you will not have to look long to find someone that looks like her. A majority of Americans are overweight and 25% of all Americans are obese (a disproportionate number of them African-American), but despite the degree of obesity in the black community, rarely do we see a black woman of her size in a leading role. If anything, the filmmakers should be commended for the bold casting of the lead role. And to those posters that suggest that being overweight equates being well-fed are only showing their ignorance. Many people, especially those in impoverished communities whether it be Harlem or the Appalachians are overweight precisely because they are poorly fed. Just look at the lack of vegetables and the abundance of vitamin-poor fatty foods in Precious' household. Finally, having read your review of the complex and brilliant "Eve's Bayou," which you of course also panned, you clearly have a problem with any black film that even hints at the topic of incest. But Mr. White, whether you believe or it not, incest is a serious problem in America. While it has been explored in numerous critically acclaimed films involving white actors from "Chinatown" to "Hamlet," it's rarely shown involving black characters. But just like white families, incest is a serious problem in the black community as well and needs to be explored. It was the late Senegalese filmmaker Ousmane Sembene that once said, "I make films about what is wrong in society." "Precious" is clearly one of those films. While not for everybody, contrary to what White says, "Precious" is a story of a woman despite facing enormous obstacles, triumphs simply by facing up to those challenges head on.

 

 
 


  • Fri
    20
  • Sat
    21
  • Sun
    22
  • Mon
    23
  • Tue
    24
  • Wed
    25
  • Thu
    26

Search in Events

Sign up for the NYPress
e-newsletter for weekly updates
and exciting event info:





Join us on Facebook Follow Us
on Twitter








 User Profile (click to open)



New_York_300_60.gif

 
 
Close
Close